Literature DB >> 18387707

Medical response to a radiologic/nuclear event: integrated plan from the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, Department of Health and Human Services.

C Norman Coleman1, Chad Hrdina, Judith L Bader, Ann Norwood, Robert Hayhurst, Joseph Forsha, Kevin Yeskey, Ann Knebel.   

Abstract

The end of the Cold War led to a reduced concern for a major nuclear event. However, the current threats from terrorism make a radiologic (dispersal or use of radioactive material) or nuclear (improvised nuclear device) event a possibility. The specter and enormousness of the catastrophe resulting from a state-sponsored nuclear attack and a sense of nihilism about the effectiveness of a response were such that there had been limited civilian medical response planning. Although the consequences of a radiologic dispersal device are substantial, and the detonation of a modest-sized (10 kiloton) improvised nuclear device is catastrophic, it is both possible and imperative that a medical response be planned. To meet this need, the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response in the Department of Health and Human Services, in collaboration within government and with nongovernment partners, has developed a scientifically based comprehensive planning framework and Web-based "just-in-time" medical response information called Radiation Event Medical Management (available at http://www.remm.nlm.gov). The response plan includes (1) underpinnings from basic radiation biology, (2) tailored medical responses, (3) delivery of medical countermeasures for postevent mitigation and treatment, (4) referral to expert centers for acute treatment, and (5) long-term follow-up. Although continuing to evolve and increase in scope and capacity, current response planning is sufficiently mature that planners and responders should be aware of the basic premises, tools, and resources available. An effective response will require coordination, communication, and cooperation at an unprecedented level. The logic behind and components of this response are presented to allow for active collaboration among emergency planners and responders and federal, state, local, and tribal governments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18387707     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.12.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  30 in total

1.  Pulmonary injury after combined exposures to low-dose low-LET radiation and fungal spores.

Authors:  B Marples; L Downing; K E Sawarynski; J N Finkelstein; J P Williams; A A Martinez; G D Wilson; M D Sims
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  To survive radiation injury, remember your aPCs.

Authors:  John P Chute
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  Early alterations in cytokine expression in adult compared to developing lung in mice after radiation exposure.

Authors:  Carl J Johnston; Eric Hernady; Christina Reed; Sally W Thurston; Jacob N Finkelstein; Jacqueline P Williams
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Biological Dosimetry by the Triage Dicentric Chromosome Assay - Further validation of International Networking.

Authors:  Ruth C Wilkins; Horst Romm; Ursula Oestreicher; Leonora Marro; Mitsuaki A Yoshida; Y Suto; Pataje G S Prasanna
Journal:  Radiat Meas       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 1.898

Review 5.  Literature review and global consensus on management of acute radiation syndrome affecting nonhematopoietic organ systems.

Authors:  Nicholas Dainiak; Robert Nicolas Gent; Zhanat Carr; Rita Schneider; Judith Bader; Elena Buglova; Nelson Chao; C Norman Coleman; Arnold Ganser; Claude Gorin; Martin Hauer-Jensen; L Andrew Huff; Patricia Lillis-Hearne; Kazuhiko Maekawa; Jeffrey Nemhauser; Ray Powles; Holger Schünemann; Alla Shapiro; Leif Stenke; Nelson Valverde; David Weinstock; Douglas White; Joseph Albanese; Viktor Meineke
Journal:  Disaster Med Public Health Prep       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 1.385

Review 6.  Factors Affecting the Quality of Tooth Enamel for In Vivo EPR-Based Retrospective Biodosimetry.

Authors:  Céline M Desmet; Philippe Levêque; Bernard Gallez
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 0.972

7.  Radiation injury treatment network (RITN): healthcare professionals preparing for a mass casualty radiological or nuclear incident.

Authors:  Joel R Ross; Cullen Case; Dennis Confer; Daniel J Weisdorf; David Weinstock; Robert Krawisz; John Chute; Julie Wilhauk; Willis Navarro; Robert Hartzman; C Norman Coleman; Richard Hatchett; Nelson Chao
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 2.694

8.  Development of a novel mouth model as an alternative tool to test the effectiveness of an in vivo EPR dosimetry system.

Authors:  Kyo Kobayashi; Ruhong Dong; Roberto Javier Nicolalde; Paul Calderon; Gaixin Du; Benjamin B Williams; Masaichi-Chang-Il Lee; Harold M Swartz; Ann Barry Flood
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Imaging tooth enamel using zero echo time (ZTE) magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Kevin M Rychert; Gang Zhu; Maciej M Kmiec; Venkata K Nemani; Benjamin B Williams; Ann Barry Flood; Harold M Swartz; Barjor Gimi
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2015-03-19

10.  Diagnosis of partial body radiation exposure in mice using peripheral blood gene expression profiles.

Authors:  Sarah K Meadows; Holly K Dressman; Pamela Daher; Heather Himburg; J Lauren Russell; Phuong Doan; Nelson J Chao; Joseph Lucas; Joseph R Nevins; John P Chute
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.