Literature DB >> 18387586

Switching between colors and shapes on the basis of positive and negative feedback: an fMRI and EEG study on feedback-based learning.

Kiki Zanolie1, Santani Teng, Sarah E Donohue, Anna C K van Duijvenvoorde, Guido P H Band, Serge A R B Rombouts, Eveline A Crone.   

Abstract

A crucial element of testing hypotheses about rules for behavior is the use of performance feedback. In this study, we used fMRI and EEG to test the role of medial prefrontal cortex (PFC) and dorsolateral (DL) PFC in hypothesis testing using a modified intradimensional/extradimensional rule shift task. Eighteen adults were asked to infer rules about color or shape on the basis of positive and negative feedback in sets of two trials. Half of the trials involved color-to-color or shape-to-shape trials (intradimensional switches; ID) and the other half involved color-to-shape or shape-to-color trials (extradimensional switches; ED). Participants performed the task in separate fMRI and EEG sessions. ED trials were associated with reduced accuracy relative to ID trials. In addition, accuracy was reduced and response latencies increased following negative relative to positive feedback. Negative feedback resulted in increased activation in medial PFC and DLPFC, but more so for ED than ID shifts. Reduced accuracy following negative feedback correlated with increased activation in DLPFC, and increased response latencies following negative feedback correlated with increased activation in medial PFC. Additionally, around 250msec following negative performance feedback participants showed a feedback-related negative scalp potential, but this potential did not differ between ID and ED shifts. These results indicate that both medial PFC and DLPFC signal the need for performance adjustment, and both regions are sensitive to the increased demands of set shifting in hypothesis testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18387586     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  7 in total

1.  Elaborative feedback: Engaging reward and task-relevant brain regions promotes learning in pseudoword reading aloud.

Authors:  Samantha R Mattheiss; Edward J Alexander; William W Graves
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Neural correlates of reversal learning in severe mood dysregulation and pediatric bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Nancy E Adleman; Reilly Kayser; Daniel Dickstein; R James R Blair; Daniel Pine; Ellen Leibenluft
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 8.829

3.  Domain general and domain preferential brain regions associated with different types of task switching: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chobok Kim; Sara E Cilles; Nathan F Johnson; Brian T Gold
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Selective aspiration or neurotoxic lesions of orbital frontal areas 11 and 13 spared monkeys' performance on the object discrimination reversal task.

Authors:  Andy Kazama; Jocelyne Bachevalier
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Brain Activation of Negative Feedback in Rule Acquisition Revealed in a Segmented Wisconsin Card Sorting Test.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Bihua Cao; Xueli Cai; Heming Gao; Fuhong Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Want More? Learn Less: Motivation Affects Adolescents Learning from Negative Feedback.

Authors:  Yun Zhuang; Wenfeng Feng; Yu Liao
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-01-27

7.  Different Electrophysiological Responses to Informative Value of Feedback Between Children and Adults.

Authors:  Bin Du; Bihua Cao; Weiqi He; Fuhong Li
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.