Literature DB >> 18386914

Screening-limited response of nanobiosensors.

Pradeep R Nair1, Muhammad A Alam.   

Abstract

Despite tremendous potential of highly sensitive electronic detection of biomolecules by nanoscale biosensors for genomics and proteomic applications, many aspects of experimentally observed sensor response (S) are difficult to understand within isolated theoretical frameworks of kinetic response or electrolyte screening. In this paper, we combine analytic solutions of Poisson-Boltzmann and diffusion-capture equations to show that the electrostatic screening within an ionic environment limits the response of nanobiosensor such that S(t) approximately c1(ln(rho0) - ln(I0)/2 + ln(t)/ D F + c2[pH]) + c3 where c i are geometry-dependent constants, rho0 is the concentration of target molecules, I0 the salt concentration, and D F the fractal dimension of sensor surface. Our analysis provides a coherent theoretical interpretation of a wide variety of puzzling experimental data that have so far defied intuitive explanation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18386914     DOI: 10.1021/nl072593i

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nano Lett        ISSN: 1530-6984            Impact factor:   11.189


  33 in total

Review 1.  Molecular analysis of blood with micro-/nanoscale field-effect-transistor biosensors.

Authors:  Matthew S Makowski; Albena Ivanisevic
Journal:  Small       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 13.281

2.  Flexure-FET biosensor to break the fundamental sensitivity limits of nanobiosensors using nonlinear electromechanical coupling.

Authors:  Ankit Jain; Pradeep R Nair; Muhammad A Alam
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Theory of "Selectivity" of label-free nanobiosensors: A geometro-physical perspective.

Authors:  Pradeep R Nair; Muhammad A Alam
Journal:  J Appl Phys       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Non-faradaic impedance characterization of an evaporating droplet for microfluidic and biosensing applications.

Authors:  Piyush Dak; Aida Ebrahimi; Muhammad A Alam
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 6.799

5.  Electronic desalting for controlling the ionic environment in droplet-based biosensing platforms.

Authors:  Vikhram Vilasur Swaminathan; Piyush Dak; Bobby Reddy; Eric Salm; Carlos Duarte-Guevara; Yu Zhong; Andrew Fischer; Yi-Shao Liu; Muhammad A Alam; Rashid Bashir
Journal:  Appl Phys Lett       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Theory of signal and noise in double-gated nanoscale electronic pH sensors.

Authors:  Jonghyun Go; Pradeep R Nair; Muhammad A Alam
Journal:  J Appl Phys       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  Device considerations for development of conductance-based biosensors.

Authors:  Kangho Lee; Pradeep R Nair; Adina Scott; Muhammad A Alam; David B Janes
Journal:  J Appl Phys       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 2.546

8.  High-k dielectric Al₂O₃ nanowire and nanoplate field effect sensors for improved pH sensing.

Authors:  Bobby Reddy; Brian R Dorvel; Jonghyun Go; Pradeep R Nair; Oguz H Elibol; Grace M Credo; Jonathan S Daniels; Edmond K C Chow; Xing Su; Madoo Varma; Muhammad A Alam; Rashid Bashir
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.838

9.  Subthreshold regime has the optimal sensitivity for nanowire FET biosensors.

Authors:  Xuan P A Gao; Gengfeng Zheng; Charles M Lieber
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 11.189

10.  A calibration method for nanowire biosensors to suppress device-to-device variation.

Authors:  Fumiaki N Ishikawa; Marco Curreli; Hsiao-Kang Chang; Po-Chiang Chen; Rui Zhang; Richard J Cote; Mark E Thompson; Chongwu Zhou
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 15.881

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.