PURPOSE: (123)I-N-omega-fluoropropyl-2-beta-carboxymethoxy-3beta-(4-iodophenyl)nortropane ((123)I-FP-CIT) Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) has been suggested to be a useful diagnostic adjunct in patients with clinically uncertain parkinsonism. We developed a pharmaco-economic (PE) model, evaluating the cost effectiveness of adding (123)I-FP-CIT SPECT to the diagnostic workup. As the model was developed before application of the diagnostic technique in real practice, a predictive validity assessment was performed based on data from a large nationwide patient registry in these patients. METHODS: A PE model, using a Markov state transition model, was created, based on literature-derived and clinical expert panel data. Effects were expressed as adequately treated years (ATY). Key input data were compared to the real-life patterns in a nationwide multi-centre clinical setting, based on a complete national registry of 1,701 consecutive patients. The change in initial diagnosis and alteration of management of the patient after SPECT were registered. RESULTS: In the PE model, it was calculated that management would change in 48.5% of patients by SPECT and that, over a 5-year period, 1.2 ATYs could be gained at a yearly additional cost of 72 euro. From the studied 1,701 patients, nigrostriatal degeneration was observed in 59.8%, the initial diagnosis was changed in 51.5%, management was altered in 49%, and cost effectiveness was increased to 358 euro per ATY. CONCLUSION: Good correspondence between assumed and observed changes in patient management was found, indicating that (123)I-FP-CIT SPECT is influential in diagnosis and management of patients with uncertain clinical diagnosis of parkinsonism. This can be achieved at a marginal added cost to the health insurance and leads to a significant gain in ATY.
PURPOSE: (123)I-N-omega-fluoropropyl-2-beta-carboxymethoxy-3beta-(4-iodophenyl)nortropane ((123)I-FP-CIT) Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) has been suggested to be a useful diagnostic adjunct in patients with clinically uncertain parkinsonism. We developed a pharmaco-economic (PE) model, evaluating the cost effectiveness of adding (123)I-FP-CIT SPECT to the diagnostic workup. As the model was developed before application of the diagnostic technique in real practice, a predictive validity assessment was performed based on data from a large nationwide patient registry in these patients. METHODS: A PE model, using a Markov state transition model, was created, based on literature-derived and clinical expert panel data. Effects were expressed as adequately treated years (ATY). Key input data were compared to the real-life patterns in a nationwide multi-centre clinical setting, based on a complete national registry of 1,701 consecutive patients. The change in initial diagnosis and alteration of management of the patient after SPECT were registered. RESULTS: In the PE model, it was calculated that management would change in 48.5% of patients by SPECT and that, over a 5-year period, 1.2 ATYs could be gained at a yearly additional cost of 72 euro. From the studied 1,701 patients, nigrostriatal degeneration was observed in 59.8%, the initial diagnosis was changed in 51.5%, management was altered in 49%, and cost effectiveness was increased to 358 euro per ATY. CONCLUSION: Good correspondence between assumed and observed changes in patient management was found, indicating that (123)I-FP-CIT SPECT is influential in diagnosis and management of patients with uncertain clinical diagnosis of parkinsonism. This can be achieved at a marginal added cost to the health insurance and leads to a significant gain in ATY.
Authors: B Ravina; D Eidelberg; J E Ahlskog; R L Albin; D J Brooks; M Carbon; V Dhawan; A Feigin; S Fahn; M Guttman; K Gwinn-Hardy; H McFarland; R Innis; R G Katz; K Kieburtz; S J Kish; N Lange; J W Langston; K Marek; L Morin; C Moy; D Murphy; W H Oertel; G Oliver; Y Palesch; W Powers; J Seibyl; K D Sethi; C W Shults; P Sheehy; A J Stoessl; R Holloway Journal: Neurology Date: 2005-01-25 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: K L Chou; H I Hurtig; M B Stern; A Colcher; B Ravina; A Newberg; P D Mozley; A Siderowf Journal: Parkinsonism Relat Disord Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 4.891
Authors: K Van Laere; L De Ceuninck; R Dom; J Van den Eynden; H Vanbilloen; J Cleynhens; P Dupont; G Bormans; A Verbruggen; L Mortelmans Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2004-04-03 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Judith Dams; Bernhard Bornschein; Jens Peter Reese; Annette Conrads-Frank; Wolfgang H Oertel; Uwe Siebert; Richard Dodel Journal: Pharmacoeconomics Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 4.981
Authors: Ralph Buchert; Carsten Buhmann; Ivayla Apostolova; Philipp T Meyer; Jürgen Gallinat Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Markus Wenzel; Fausto Milletari; Julia Krüger; Catharina Lange; Michael Schenk; Ivayla Apostolova; Susanne Klutmann; Marcus Ehrenburg; Ralph Buchert Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-08-31 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Ralph Buchert; Andreas Kluge; Livia Tossici-Bolt; John Dickson; Marcus Bronzel; Catharina Lange; Susanne Asenbaum; Jan Booij; L Özlem Atay Kapucu; Claus Svarer; Pierre-Malick Koulibaly; Flavio Nobili; Marco Pagani; Osama Sabri; Terez Sera; Klaus Tatsch; Thierry Vander Borght; Koen Van Laere; Andrea Varrone; Hidehiro Iida Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2016-01-27 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Helen Schmitz-Steinkrüger; Catharina Lange; Ivayla Apostolova; Franziska L Mathies; Lars Frings; Susanne Klutmann; Sabine Hellwig; Philipp T Meyer; Ralph Buchert Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2020-10-31 Impact factor: 9.236