Literature DB >> 18385527

Optimized motion estimation for MRE data with reduced motion encodes.

Huifang Wang1, John B Weaver, Marvin M Doyley, Francis E Kennedy, Keith D Paulsen.   

Abstract

Motion estimation is an essential step common to all magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) methods. For dynamic techniques, the motion is obtained from a sinusoidal fit of the image phase at multiple, uniformly spaced relative phase offsets, phi, between the motion and the motion encoding gradients (MEGs). Generally, eight values of phi sampled at the Nyquist interval pi/4 over [0, 2pi). We introduce a method, termed reduced motion encoding (RME), that reduces the number of phi required, thereby reducing the imaging time for an MRE acquisition. A frequency-domain algorithm was implemented using the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) to derive the general least-squares solution for the motion amplitude and phase given an arbitrary number of phi. A closed form representation of the condition number of the transformation matrix which is used for estimating motion was introduced to determine the sensitivity to noise for different sampling patterns of phi. Simulation results confirmed the minimum error sampling patterns suggested from the condition number maps. The minimum noise in the motion estimate is obtained when the sampled phi are essentially evenly distributed over the range [0, pi) with an interval pi/n, where n is the number of phi sampled, or alternatively with an interval 2pi/n over the range [0, 2pi) which represents the Nyquist interval. Simulations also show that the noise level decreases as n increases as expected. The decrease in noise is the largest when n is small and it becomes less significant as n increases. The algorithm also makes it possible to estimate the motion from only two values of phi, which cannot be accomplished with traditional methods because sampling at the Nyquist interval is indeterminate. Finally, noise levels in motion estimated from phantom studies and in vivo results taken with different n agreed with that predicted by simulation and condition number calculations.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18385527      PMCID: PMC2804898          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/8/012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  12 in total

1.  An overlapping subzone technique for MR-based elastic property reconstruction.

Authors:  E E Van Houten; K D Paulsen; M I Miga; F E Kennedy; J B Weaver
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Condition number as a measure of noise performance of diffusion tensor data acquisition schemes with MRI.

Authors:  S Skare; M Hedehus; M E Moseley; T Q Li
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  Tissue characterization using magnetic resonance elastography: preliminary results.

Authors:  S A Kruse; J A Smith; A J Lawrence; M A Dresner; A Manduca; J F Greenleaf; R L Ehman
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Magnetic resonance elastography using 3D gradient echo measurements of steady-state motion.

Authors:  J B Weaver; E E Van Houten; M I Miga; F E Kennedy; K D Paulsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Measurement of in vivo local shear modulus using MR elastography multiple-phase patchwork offsets.

Authors:  Mikio Suga; Tetsuya Matsuda; Kotaro Minato; Osamu Oshiro; Kunihiro Chihara; Jun Okamoto; Osamu Takizawa; Masaru Komori; Takashi Takahashi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Mechanical transient-based magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Paul J McCracken; Armando Manduca; Joel Felmlee; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Phase-contrast MR angiography with reduced acquisition time: new concepts in sequence design.

Authors:  R Hausmann; J S Lewin; G Laub
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging of transverse acoustic strain waves.

Authors:  R Muthupillai; P J Rossman; D J Lomas; J F Greenleaf; S J Riederer; R L Ehman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  High-resolution tensor MR elastography for breast tumour detection.

Authors:  R Sinkus; J Lorenzen; D Schrader; M Lorenzen; M Dargatz; D Holz
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Magnetic resonance elastography by direct visualization of propagating acoustic strain waves.

Authors:  R Muthupillai; D J Lomas; P J Rossman; J F Greenleaf; A Manduca; R L Ehman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effects of frequency- and direction-dependent elastic materials on linearly elastic MRE image reconstructions.

Authors:  I M Perreard; A J Pattison; M Doyley; M D J McGarry; Z Barani; E E Van Houten; J B Weaver; K D Paulsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  A three-dimensional quality-guided phase unwrapping method for MR elastography.

Authors:  Huifang Wang; John B Weaver; Irina I Perreard; Marvin M Doyley; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 3.609

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.