PURPOSE: Lens fiber cell differentiation is marked by the onset of betaB1-crystallin expression and is controlled by the cooperative action of a set of transcription factors including Prox1, an atypical homeodomain protein. Previously, the authors reported that Prox1 directly interacts with the OL2 element found in the chicken betaB1-crystallin basal promoter to activate the expression of this gene. Here they mapped the location of activating and repressing sequences of the full-length chicken betaB1-crystallin promoter (-432/+30) in lens epithelial cells, annular pad cells, and intact lens and characterized Prox1-binding sites found in this region. METHODS: Transfection analysis and transgenic mice were used to characterize upstream regions of the chicken betaB1-crystallin gene. DNaseI footprinting and chromatin immunoprecipitation was performed to identify Prox1-binding sites, and transfection analyses were used to characterize these sites functionally. RESULTS: Sequences between -152 and -432 of the chicken betaB1-crystallin promoter mediated either promoter activation or repression, depending on the stage of lens differentiation tested. Two new Prox1-binding sites were found in this region that bound Prox1 more avidly than the OL2 element. However, neither binding site conferred Prox1-mediated activation on a heterologous promoter; instead, each allowed Prox1 to repress promoter function. CONCLUSIONS: The function of the upstream region of the chicken betaB1-crystallin promoter changes depending on cellular context. These data suggest that Prox1 function as a transcriptional activator could be regulated at the DNA level based on the characteristics of the responsive elements.
PURPOSE: Lens fiber cell differentiation is marked by the onset of betaB1-crystallin expression and is controlled by the cooperative action of a set of transcription factors including Prox1, an atypical homeodomain protein. Previously, the authors reported that Prox1 directly interacts with the OL2 element found in the chickenbetaB1-crystallin basal promoter to activate the expression of this gene. Here they mapped the location of activating and repressing sequences of the full-length chickenbetaB1-crystallin promoter (-432/+30) in lens epithelial cells, annular pad cells, and intact lens and characterized Prox1-binding sites found in this region. METHODS: Transfection analysis and transgenic mice were used to characterize upstream regions of the chickenbetaB1-crystallin gene. DNaseI footprinting and chromatin immunoprecipitation was performed to identify Prox1-binding sites, and transfection analyses were used to characterize these sites functionally. RESULTS: Sequences between -152 and -432 of the chickenbetaB1-crystallin promoter mediated either promoter activation or repression, depending on the stage of lens differentiation tested. Two new Prox1-binding sites were found in this region that bound Prox1 more avidly than the OL2 element. However, neither binding site conferred Prox1-mediated activation on a heterologous promoter; instead, each allowed Prox1 to repress promoter function. CONCLUSIONS: The function of the upstream region of the chickenbetaB1-crystallin promoter changes depending on cellular context. These data suggest that Prox1 function as a transcriptional activator could be regulated at the DNA level based on the characteristics of the responsive elements.
Authors: Dylan S Audette; Deepti Anand; Tammy So; Troy B Rubenstein; Salil A Lachke; Frank J Lovicu; Melinda K Duncan Journal: Development Date: 2015-12-10 Impact factor: 6.868
Authors: Divya Gupta; Stephen A K Harvey; Doreswamy Kenchegowda; Sudha Swamynathan; Shivalingappa K Swamynathan Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2013-09-25 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Michael J Flister; Andrew Wilber; Kelly L Hall; Caname Iwata; Kohei Miyazono; Riccardo E Nisato; Michael S Pepper; David C Zawieja; Sophia Ran Journal: Blood Date: 2009-11-09 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Abby L Manthey; Anne M Terrell; Yan Wang; Jennifer R Taube; Alisha R Yallowitz; Melinda K Duncan Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-07-31 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Louise Wolf; Wilbur Harrison; Jie Huang; Qing Xie; Ningna Xiao; Jian Sun; Lingkun Kong; Salil A Lachke; Murali R Kuracha; Venkatesh Govindarajan; Paul K Brindle; Ruth Ashery-Padan; David C Beebe; Paul A Overbeek; Ales Cvekl Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2013-09-12 Impact factor: 16.971