Literature DB >> 18384966

Spectral processing deficits in belt auditory cortex following early postnatal lesions of somatosensory cortex.

N C Higgins1, M A Escabí, G D Rosen, A M Galaburda, H L Read.   

Abstract

Induced or genetically based cortical laminar malformations in somatosensory cortex have been associated with perceptual and acoustic processing deficits in mammals. Perinatal freeze-lesions of developing rat primary somatosensory (S1) cortex induce malformations resembling human microgyria. Induced microgyria located in parietal somatosensory cortex have been linked to reduced behavioral detection of rapid sound transitions and altered spectral processing in primary auditory cortex (A1). Here we asked whether belt auditory cortex function would be similarly altered in rats with S1 microgyria (MG+). Pure-tone acoustic response properties were assessed in A1 and ventral auditory (VAF) cortical fields with Fourier optical imaging and multi-unit recordings. Three changes in spectral response properties were observed in both A1 and VAF in MG+ rats: 1) multi-unit response magnitudes were reduced 2) optical and multi-unit frequency responses were more variable; 3) at high sound levels units responded to a broader range of pure-tone frequencies. Optical and multi-unit pure-tone response magnitudes were both reduced for low sound levels in VAF but not A1. Sound level "tuning" was reduced in VAF but not in A1. Finally, in VAF frequency tuning and spike rates near best frequency were both altered for mid- but not high-frequency recording sites. These data suggest that VAF belt auditory cortex is more vulnerable than A1 to early postnatal induction of microgyria in neighboring somatosensory cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18384966     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.01.073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  7 in total

1.  Specialization of binaural responses in ventral auditory cortices.

Authors:  Nathan C Higgins; Douglas A Storace; Monty A Escabí; Heather L Read
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Neural spike-timing patterns vary with sound shape and periodicity in three auditory cortical fields.

Authors:  Christopher M Lee; Ahmad F Osman; Maxim Volgushev; Monty A Escabí; Heather L Read
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  A high-density, high-channel count, multiplexed μECoG array for auditory-cortex recordings.

Authors:  Monty A Escabí; Heather L Read; Jonathan Viventi; Dae-Hyeong Kim; Nathan C Higgins; Douglas A Storace; Andrew S K Liu; Adam M Gifford; John F Burke; Matthew Campisi; Yun-Soung Kim; Andrew E Avrin; Van der Spiegel Jan; Yonggang Huang; Ming Li; Jian Wu; John A Rogers; Brian Litt; Yale E Cohen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Auditory cortex electrical stimulation suppresses tinnitus in rats.

Authors:  Jinsheng Zhang; Yupeng Zhang; Xueguo Zhang
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-11-06

5.  A neural link between feeling and hearing.

Authors:  Tony Ro; Timothy M Ellmore; Michael S Beauchamp
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Early acoustic discrimination experience ameliorates auditory processing deficits in male rats with cortical developmental disruption.

Authors:  Steven W Threlkeld; Courtney A Hill; Glenn D Rosen; R Holly Fitch
Journal:  Int J Dev Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 2.457

7.  Mind the Gap: Two Dissociable Mechanisms of Temporal Processing in the Auditory System.

Authors:  Lucy A Anderson; Jennifer F Linden
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 6.167

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.