Literature DB >> 18383446

Nearest neighbour adjustment and linear variance models in plant breeding trials.

Hans-Peter Piepho1, Christel Richter, Emlyn Williams.   

Abstract

This paper reviews methods for nearest neighbour analysis that adjust for local trend in one dimension. Such methods are commonly used in plant breeding and variety testing. The focus is on simple differencing methods, including first differences and the Papadakis method. We discuss mixed model representations of these methods on the scale of the observed data. Modelling observed data has a number of practical advantages compared to differencing, for example the facility to conveniently compute adjusted cultivar means. Most models considered involve a linear variance-covariance structure and can be represented as state-space models. The reviewed methods and models are exemplified using three datasets.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18383446     DOI: 10.1002/bimj.200710414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biom J        ISSN: 0323-3847            Impact factor:   2.207


  8 in total

1.  Genome-based prediction of testcross values in maize.

Authors:  Theresa Albrecht; Valentin Wimmer; Hans-Jürgen Auinger; Malena Erbe; Carsten Knaak; Milena Ouzunova; Henner Simianer; Chris-Carolin Schön
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Increased signal-to-noise ratios within experimental field trials by regressing spatially distributed soil properties as principal components.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Berry; Mingsheng Qi; Balasaheb V Sonawane; Amy Sheflin; Asaph Cousins; Jessica Prenni; Daniel P Schachtman; Peng Liu; Rebecca S Bart
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 8.713

3.  A Four Dimensional Spatio-Temporal Analysis of an Agricultural Dataset.

Authors:  Margaret R Donald; Kerrie L Mengersen; Rick R Young
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Flexible modelling of spatial variation in agricultural field trials with the R package INLA.

Authors:  Maria Lie Selle; Ingelin Steinsland; John M Hickey; Gregor Gorjanc
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  The importance of phenotypic data analysis for genomic prediction - a case study comparing different spatial models in rye.

Authors:  Angela-Maria Bernal-Vasquez; Jens Möhring; Malthe Schmidt; Manfred Schönleben; Chris-Carolin Schön; Hans-Peter Piepho
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Association Mapping in Scandinavian Winter Wheat for Yield, Plant Height, and Traits Important for Second-Generation Bioethanol Production.

Authors:  Andrea Bellucci; Anna Maria Torp; Sander Bruun; Jakob Magid; Sven B Andersen; Søren K Rasmussen
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Modelling spatial trends in sorghum breeding field trials using a two-dimensional P-spline mixed model.

Authors:  Julio G Velazco; María Xosé Rodríguez-Álvarez; Martin P Boer; David R Jordan; Paul H C Eilers; Marcos Malosetti; Fred A van Eeuwijk
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Blocking and re-arrangement of pots in greenhouse experiments: which approach is more effective?

Authors:  Jens Hartung; Juliane Wagener; Reiner Ruser; Hans-Peter Piepho
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.993

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.