Literature DB >> 18382253

Pulmonary artery catheters: state of the controversy.

Susan K Frazier1, Glenda J Skinner.   

Abstract

Since 1970, pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) have been used in clinical practice to monitor the hemodynamic status of critically ill and injured patients. This technology was introduced and commercialized without considerable testing to determine safety and efficacy. After years of common clinical use, investigators identified potential increases in mortality associated with PAC use. For the past decade, investigators have studied various patient populations to elucidate the safety and efficacy of the PAC. This article reviews the historical context of PAC use, findings from recent clinical trials intended to determine safety and efficacy, issues with reliability and validity of PAC use, and complications associated with PAC use. Data from recent clinical trials do not support routine use of PACs, and the authors suggest that PAC-guided therapy should be the focus of study in future trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18382253     DOI: 10.1097/01.JCN.0000305073.49613.db

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs        ISSN: 0889-4655            Impact factor:   2.083


  9 in total

1.  Cardiac index value measurement by invasive, semi-invasive and non invasive techniques: a prospective study in postoperative off pump coronary artery bypass surgery patients.

Authors:  Murali Chakravarthy; Subramanyam Rajeev; Vivek Jawali
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2009-05-02       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Algorithmic processing of pressure waveforms to facilitate estimation of cardiac elastance.

Authors:  David Stevenson; James Revie; J Geoffrey Chase; Christopher E Hann; Geoffrey M Shaw; Bernard Lambermont; Alexandre Ghuysen; Philippe Kolh; Thomas Desaive
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 2.819

3.  Beat-to-beat estimation of the continuous left and right cardiac elastance from metrics commonly available in clinical settings.

Authors:  David Stevenson; James Revie; J Geoffrey Chase; Christopher E Hann; Geoffrey M Shaw; Bernard Lambermont; Alexandre Ghuysen; Philippe Kolh; Thomas Desaive
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 4.  The Use of Pulmonary Artery Catheter in Sepsis Patients: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Dimitrios Velissaris; Vasilios Karamouzos; Ioanna Kotroni; Charalampos Pierrakos; Menelaos Karanikolas
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2016-09-29

5.  Minimally invasive, patient specific, beat-by-beat estimation of left ventricular time varying elastance.

Authors:  Shaun Davidson; Chris Pretty; Antoine Pironet; Shun Kamoi; Joel Balmer; Thomas Desaive; J Geoffrey Chase
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 6.  Next-generation, personalised, model-based critical care medicine: a state-of-the art review of in silico virtual patient models, methods, and cohorts, and how to validation them.

Authors:  J Geoffrey Chase; Jean-Charles Preiser; Jennifer L Dickson; Antoine Pironet; Yeong Shiong Chiew; Christopher G Pretty; Geoffrey M Shaw; Balazs Benyo; Knut Moeller; Soroush Safaei; Merryn Tawhai; Peter Hunter; Thomas Desaive
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.819

7.  Tying the knot: An uncommon complication.

Authors:  Konstantinos Boumpoulis; Andrew C Chatzis; Marina Balanika; Michael Milonakis; Mazen Khoury
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2019-06-24

8.  Blood pressure waveform contour analysis for assessing peripheral resistance changes in sepsis.

Authors:  Shaun Davidson; Chris Pretty; Joel Balmer; Thomas Desaive; J Geoffrey Chase
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  Pulmonary artery catheter - Dilemma is still on?

Authors:  Manjula Sarkar; Sanjeeta Umbarkar
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2021 Jan-Mar
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.