Literature DB >> 18382240

Clinical endpoints for drug development in prostate cancer.

Veshana Ramiah1, Daniel J George, Andrew J Armstrong.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Overall survival remains the benchmark in phase III settings of novel agents in castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer. This review highlights many of the current potential early measures of response and clinical benefit that are worthy of future study and validation in this disease. RECENT
FINDINGS: The clinical evaluation of novel agents in advanced prostate cancer remains challenging for several reasons. Men with metastatic prostate cancer often have bone-only disease in which formal radiologic response and progression criteria may not apply. Declines in serum prostate-specific antigen levels may be modest surrogates of response to cytotoxic agents such as docetaxel, but have not been validated for agents with novel mechanisms of action, such as antiangiogenic, immunologic, or cytostatic drugs. Novel radiologic imaging techniques such as PET scans are not yet validated for use in monitoring or staging advanced prostate cancer. Measures of delay, control, and palliation of metastatic disease such as pain response, time to progression and progression-free survival, while appealing endpoints that may highlight the clinical benefit of novel agents, have been difficult to define rigorously and have not yet demonstrated adequate surrogacy for overall survival.
SUMMARY: The measures of response highlighted in this review, if validated, may improve the current evaluation of novel agents in phase II settings and the potential accelerated approval of these agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18382240     DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3282fb7807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Urol        ISSN: 0963-0643            Impact factor:   2.309


  7 in total

1.  Integrated Analysis of Multiple Biomarkers from Circulating Tumor Cells Enabled by Exclusion-Based Analyte Isolation.

Authors:  Jamie M Sperger; Lindsay N Strotman; Allison Welsh; Benjamin P Casavant; Zachery Chalmers; Sacha Horn; Erika Heninger; Stephanie M Thiede; Jacob Tokar; Benjamin K Gibbs; David J Guckenberger; Lakeesha Carmichael; Scott M Dehm; Philip J Stephens; David J Beebe; Scott M Berry; Joshua M Lang
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Clinical and biological significance of KISS1 expression in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Honghe Wang; Jacqueline Jones; Timothy Turner; Qinghua P He; Shana Hardy; William E Grizzle; Danny R Welch; Clayton Yates
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 4.307

3.  Leukemia-free survival as a surrogate end point for overall survival in the evaluation of maintenance therapy for patients with acute myeloid leukemia in complete remission.

Authors:  Marc Buyse; Stefan Michiels; Pierre Squifflet; Kathryn J Lucchesi; Kristoffer Hellstrand; Mats L Brune; Sylvie Castaigne; Jacob M Rowe
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 4.  Evolving role of bone biomarkers in castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Janet E Brown; Sheryl Sim
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 5.  Effective incorporation of biomarkers into phase II trials.

Authors:  Lisa M McShane; Sally Hunsberger; Alex A Adjei
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Circulating and disseminated tumor cells in the management of advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stephan Kruck; Georgios Gakis; Arnulf Stenzl
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2011-08-21

Review 7.  Kisspeptin and Cancer: Molecular Interaction, Biological Functions, and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Vincenza Ciaramella; Carminia Maria Della Corte; Fortunato Ciardiello; Floriana Morgillo
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 5.555

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.