Deborah C Glik1, David P Eisenman2, Ian Donatello3, Abdelmonem Afifi3, Michael Stajura1, Michael L Prelip1, Jitka Sammartinova1, Andrea Martel1. 1. University of California, Los Angeles, Fielding School of Public Health, Department of Community Health Sciences, Los Angeles, CA. 2. University of California, Los Angeles, Fielding School of Public Health, Department of Community Health Sciences, Los Angeles, CA ; University of California, Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Los Angeles, CA. 3. University of California, Los Angeles, Fielding School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Los Angeles, CA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study presents reliability and validity findings for the Assessment for Disaster Engagement with Partners Tool (ADEPT), an instrument that can be used to monitor the frequency and nature of collaborative activities between local health departments (LHDs) and community-based organizations (CBOs) and faith-based organizations (FBOs) for disaster preparedness, response, and recovery. METHODS: We used formative research to develop the instrument by ranking LHDs according to their disaster outreach and engagement activities. We validated the scale through a 2011 national survey of disaster preparedness coordinators (n=273) working in LHDs. We reduced the original measure of 25 items to a final measure comprising 15 items with four dimensions: (1) communication outreach and coordination, (2) resource mobilization, (3) organizational capacity building, and (4) partnership development and maintenance. We used internal consistency reliability m correlation and factor analysis to validate the measure. RESULTS: Using internal consistency reliability, we found reasonable inter-item reliability for the four hypothesized dimensions (Cronbach's alpha: 0.71-0.88). These four dimensions were confirmed through correlation and factor analysis (Varimax rotation). CONCLUSION: Higher scores on all four dimensions of ADEPT for organizational respondents suggest that more activities were conducted for inter-organizational preparedness in those organizations than in organizations whose respondents had lower scores. This finding implies that organizations with higher ADEPT scores have more active relationships with CBOs/FBOs in the realm of preparedness, a key element for creating community resilience for emergencies and disaster preparedness.
OBJECTIVE: This study presents reliability and validity findings for the Assessment for Disaster Engagement with Partners Tool (ADEPT), an instrument that can be used to monitor the frequency and nature of collaborative activities between local health departments (LHDs) and community-based organizations (CBOs) and faith-based organizations (FBOs) for disaster preparedness, response, and recovery. METHODS: We used formative research to develop the instrument by ranking LHDs according to their disaster outreach and engagement activities. We validated the scale through a 2011 national survey of disaster preparedness coordinators (n=273) working in LHDs. We reduced the original measure of 25 items to a final measure comprising 15 items with four dimensions: (1) communication outreach and coordination, (2) resource mobilization, (3) organizational capacity building, and (4) partnership development and maintenance. We used internal consistency reliability m correlation and factor analysis to validate the measure. RESULTS: Using internal consistency reliability, we found reasonable inter-item reliability for the four hypothesized dimensions (Cronbach's alpha: 0.71-0.88). These four dimensions were confirmed through correlation and factor analysis (Varimax rotation). CONCLUSION: Higher scores on all four dimensions of ADEPT for organizational respondents suggest that more activities were conducted for inter-organizational preparedness in those organizations than in organizations whose respondents had lower scores. This finding implies that organizations with higher ADEPT scores have more active relationships with CBOs/FBOs in the realm of preparedness, a key element for creating community resilience for emergencies and disaster preparedness.
Authors: Michael D Barnes; Carl L Hanson; Len M B Novilla; Aaron T Meacham; Emily McIntyre; Brittany C Erickson Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2008-02-28 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Anjali T Pant; Thomas D Kirsch; Italo R Subbarao; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh; Alexander Vu Journal: Prehosp Disaster Med Date: 2008 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.040
Authors: E Brooke Lerner; Michael Cronin; Richard B Schwartz; Teri L Sanddal; Scott M Sasser; Tim Czapranski; Gina M Piazza; William D Sheahan Journal: Disaster Med Public Health Prep Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 1.385
Authors: Fatemeh Rezaei; Mohammad R Maracy; Mohammad H Yarmohammadian; Ali Ardalan; Mahmood Keyvanara Journal: Fam Med Community Health Date: 2019-06-27