Literature DB >> 18381373

Prognostic and therapeutic implications of dipyridamole stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance on the basis of the ischaemic cascade.

V Bodi1, J Sanchis, M P Lopez-Lereu, J Nunez, L Mainar, J V Monmeneu, V Ruiz, E Rumiz, O Husser, D Moratal, J Millet, F J Chorro, A Llacer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prognostic and therapeutic implications of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) on the basis of the ischaemic cascade.
SETTING: Single centre study in a teaching hospital in Spain. PATIENTS: Dipyridamole stress CMR was performed on 601 patients with ischaemic chest pain and known or suspected coronary artery disease. On the basis of the ischaemic cascade, patients were categorised in C1 (no evidence of ischaemia, n = 354), C2 (isolated perfusion deficit at stress first-pass perfusion imaging, n = 181) and C3 (simultaneous perfusion deficit and inducible wall motion abnormalities, n = 66). CMR-related revascularisation (n = 102, 17%) was defined as the procedure prompted by the CMR results and carried out within the next three months.
RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 553 days, 69 major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including 21 cardiac deaths, 14 non-fatal myocardial infarctions and 34 admissions for unstable angina with documented abnormal angiography were detected. In non-revascularised patients (n = 499), the MACE rate was 4% (14/340) in C1, 20% (26/128) in C2 and 39% (12/31) in C3 (adjusted p value = 0.004 vs C2 and <0.001 vs C1). CMR-related revascularisation had neutral effects in C2 (20% vs 19%, 1.1 (0.5 to 2.4), p = 0.7) but independently reduced the risk of MACE in C3 (39% vs 11%, 0.2 (0.1 to 0.7), p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Dypiridamole stress CMR is able to stratify risk on the basis of the ischaemic cascade. A small group of patients with severe ischaemia-simultaneous perfusion deficit and inducible wall motion abnormalities-are at the highest risk and benefit most from MACE reduction due to revascularisation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18381373     DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2007.139683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  18 in total

1.  Prognostic value of a new semiquantitative score system for adenosine stress myocardial perfusion by CMR.

Authors:  Sonia Gómez-Revelles; Xavier Rossello; José Díaz-Villanueva; Ignacio López-Lima; Esteban Sciarresi; Mariano Estofán; Francesc Carreras; Sandra Pujadas; Guillem Pons-Lladó
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Clinical value of hyperemic left ventricular systolic function in vasodilator stress testing.

Authors:  Venkatesh L Murthy; Sharmila Dorbala
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Myocardial CT perfusion imaging for ischemia detection.

Authors:  Patricia Carrascosa; Carlos Capunay
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-04

4.  Does ischemia burden in stable coronary artery disease effectively identify revascularization candidates? Ischemia burden in stable coronary artery disease does not effectively identify revascularization candidates.

Authors:  Harmony R Reynolds; Michael H Picard; Judith S Hochman
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 7.792

Review 5.  Pharmacological stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Runyawan Chotenimitkhun; W Gregory Hundley
Journal:  Postgrad Med       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 6.  Identification of left ventricular myocardial ischemia and cardiac prognosis with cardiovascular magnetic resonance: updates from 2008 to 2010.

Authors:  Runyawan Chotenimitkhun; W Gregory Hundley
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 7.  Comparative definitions for moderate-severe ischemia in stress nuclear, echocardiography, and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Daniel S Berman; Michael H Picard; Matthias G Friedrich; Raymond Y Kwong; Gregg W Stone; Roxy Senior; James K Min; Rory Hachamovitch; Marielle Scherrer-Crosbie; Jennifer H Mieres; Thomas H Marwick; Lawrence M Phillips; Farooq A Chaudhry; Patricia A Pellikka; Piotr Slomka; Andrew E Arai; Ami E Iskandrian; Timothy M Bateman; Gary V Heller; Todd D Miller; Eike Nagel; Abhinav Goyal; Salvador Borges-Neto; William E Boden; Harmony R Reynolds; Judith S Hochman; David J Maron; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-06

Review 8.  Myocardial Viability on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance.

Authors:  Ana Luiza Mansur Souto; Rafael Mansur Souto; Isabella Cristina Resende Teixeira; Marcelo Souto Nacif
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.000

9.  Head-to-head comparison of 1 week versus 6 months CMR-derived infarct size for prediction of late events after STEMI.

Authors:  Oliver Husser; Jose V Monmeneu; Clara Bonanad; Cristina Gomez; Fabian Chaustre; Julio Nunez; Maria P Lopez-Lereu; Gema Minana; Juan Sanchis; Luis Mainar; Vicente Ruiz; Maria J Forteza; Isabel Trapero; David Moratal; Francisco J Chorro; Vicente Bodi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Prognostic value of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael J Lipinski; Courtney M McVey; Jeffrey S Berger; Christopher M Kramer; Michael Salerno
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 24.094

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.