Literature DB >> 18380822

Prospective comparative study of single dose versus 3-day administration of antimicrobial prophylaxis in minimum incision endoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Mizuaki Sakura1, Satoru Kawakami, Souichiro Yoshida, Hitoshi Masuda, Tsuyoshi Kobayashi, Kazunori Kihara.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: From the critical stand point against the overuse of antimicrobial agents, appropriate reduction of antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) should be considered. We have prospectively reduced AMP and evaluated the occurrence of surgical site infection (SSI) following radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) by minimum incision endoscopic surgery (MIES).
METHODS: A total of 101 consecutive patients who underwent MIES-RRP for prostate carcinoma were classified into two groups according to AMP dose. The 3-day group of 52 patients received tazobactam sodium/piperacillin sodium (TAZ/PIPC) 2.5 g intravenously before the operation and continued twice daily until postoperative day 2, and the single dose group of 49 patients received TAZ/PIPC 2.5 g intravenously only once before the operation. Additional antimicrobial agents were given only when SSI occurred. The occurrence of SSI and remote infection (RI) were analyzed.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the rate of SSI occurrence between the 3-day group (3.8%) and single dose group (6.1%) (P = 0.6). RI did not increase in the single dose group.
CONCLUSION: Antimicrobial prophylaxis dose was successfully reduced without increasing SSI or RI. A single dose of AMP is feasible to prevent SSI and RI and would be a standard regimen in MIES-RRP. Active surveillance of postoperative infection is mandatory to promptly administer antimicrobial treatment as the need arises.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18380822     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02001.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Urol        ISSN: 0919-8172            Impact factor:   3.369


  5 in total

Review 1.  Preoperative assessment of the patient and risk factors for infectious complications and tentative classification of surgical field contamination of urological procedures.

Authors:  Magnus Grabe; Henry Botto; Mete Cek; Peter Tenke; Florian M E Wagenlehner; Kurt G Naber; Truls E Bjerklund Johansen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Radical Prostatectomy: Comparison of 2-Day and More than 2-Day Prophylaxis.

Authors:  Bosung Shin; Ho Seok Chung; Eu Chang Hwang; Seung Il Jung; Dong Deuk Kwon
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.153

3.  Successful reduction of hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a urology ward: a 10-year study.

Authors:  Manabu Tatokoro; Kazunori Kihara; Hitoshi Masuda; Masaya Ito; Soichiro Yoshida; Toshiki Kijima; Minato Yokoyama; Kazutaka Saito; Fumitaka Koga; Satoru Kawakami; Yasuhisa Fujii
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 2.264

4.  A prospective Korean multicenter study for infectious complications in patients undergoing prostate surgery: risk factors and efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis.

Authors:  Eu Chang Hwang; Seung Il Jung; Dong Deuk Kwon; Gilho Lee; Jae Hyun Bae; Yong Gil Na; Seung Ki Min; Hwancheol Son; Sun Ju Lee; Jae Min Chung; Hong Chung; In Rae Cho; Young Ho Kim; Tae-Hyoung Kim; In Ho Chang
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Assessment of Guideline Discordance With Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Best Practices for Common Urologic Procedures.

Authors:  Chelsea Khaw; Anthony D Oberle; Brian C Lund; Jason Egge; Brett H Heintz; Bradley A Erickson; Daniel J Livorsi
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2018-12-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.