Literature DB >> 18379411

The correlation of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in cervical compression myelopathy with neurologic and radiologic severity.

Yoichi Aota1, Tetsu Niwa, Masaaki Uesugi, Takayuki Yamashita, Tomio Inoue, Tomoyuki Saito.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective evaluation of diffusion-weighted imaging, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, and T2-weighted images in patients with cervical compression myelopathy.
OBJECTIVE: To correlate high signal intensity on ADC maps and T2-weighted images to neurologic severity and radiologic spinal cord compression. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies indicated that the ADC map was more sensitive in detection of cervical compressive myelopathy than T2-weighted imaging. The relationship to neurologic severity has not been previously published.
METHODS: In 100 patients with or without cervical compressive myelopathy, the magnetic resonance appearance of the spinal cord on ADC maps and T2-weighted images was evaluated independently by 2 readers. On the basis of the presence or absence of abnormality, patients were categorized into 4 groups by type of intramedullary change. The degree of canal compression and the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score for cervical myelopathy were compared among the 4 types.
RESULTS: The type I group consisted of 32 patients without signal change on either ADC maps or T2-weighted images. The type II group had 33 patients with high signal intensity only on the ADC map. The type III group contained 28 patients with high signal intensity on both the ADC map and the T2-weighted images. The type IV group comprised 7 patients with high signal intensity only on T2-weighted images. The degree of canal compression and the JOA scores were significantly different among the 4 groups (P < 0.005). Most type III (25 of 28) and type IV (7 of 7) patients had severe cord compression. Average JOA scores in each type were (I) 16.0, (II) 14.7, (III) 11.7, and (IV) 8.7.
CONCLUSION: ADC maps demonstrated internal changes in the early stages of chronic spinal cord compression, but had limitations for the detection of intramedullary changes in late-stage myelopathy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18379411     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318169505e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  12 in total

1.  Diffusion tensor imaging in the cervical spinal cord.

Authors:  Ting Song; Wen-Jun Chen; Bo Yang; Hong-Pu Zhao; Jian-Wei Huang; Ming-Jin Cai; Tian-Fa Dong; Tang-Sheng Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Diffusion tensor imaging and fibre tracking in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Jean-François Budzik; Vincent Balbi; Vianney Le Thuc; Alain Duhamel; Richard Assaker; Anne Cotten
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Application of diffusion tensor imaging for the diagnosis of segmental level of dysfunction in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Y Suetomi; T Kanchiku; S Nishijima; Y Imajo; H Suzuki; Y Yoshida; N Nishida; T Taguchi
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tractography in cervical compressive myelopathy: preliminary results.

Authors:  Joon Woo Lee; Jae Hyoung Kim; Jong Bin Park; Kun Woo Park; Jin S Yeom; Guen Young Lee; Heung Sik Kang
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 5.  Role of Diffusion Tensor MR Imaging in Degenerative Cervical Spine Disease: a Review of the Literature.

Authors:  A Banaszek; J Bladowska; P Podgórski; M J Sąsiadek
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.649

6.  Evaluation of cervical myelopathy using apparent diffusion coefficient measured by diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  T Sato; T Horikoshi; A Watanabe; M Uchida; K Ishigame; T Araki; H Kinouchi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 7.  Advances in MR imaging for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Benjamin M Ellingson; Noriko Salamon; Langston T Holly
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  The natural history and clinical presentation of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Chester K Yarbrough; Rory K J Murphy; Wilson Z Ray; Todd J Stewart
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2011-12-22

Review 9.  Diffusion tensor imaging studies of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaofei Guan; Guoxin Fan; Xinbo Wu; Guangfei Gu; Xin Gu; Hailong Zhang; Shisheng He
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Normal Values of Diffusion Tensor Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters in the Cervical Spinal Cord.

Authors:  Kazuki Chagawa; Shunka Nishijima; Tsukasa Kanchiku; Yasuaki Imajo; Hidenori Suzuki; Yuichiro Yoshida; Toshihiko Taguchi
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-07-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.