Literature DB >> 26503221

Application of diffusion tensor imaging for the diagnosis of segmental level of dysfunction in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Y Suetomi1,2, T Kanchiku1, S Nishijima2, Y Imajo1, H Suzuki1, Y Yoshida1, N Nishida1, T Taguchi1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective study.
OBJECTIVES: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) reflects pathological change in the spinal cord more sensitively than conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Electrophysiological examination enables quantitative assessment of spinal cord function. Few studies have addressed the correlation between intraoperative spinal cord-evoked potentials (SCEPs) and DTI. The purpose of this study was to examine whether DTI is an objective index for the diagnosis of the segmental level of dysfunction in cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).
SETTING: Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
METHODS: Using 3.0-Tesla MRI, DTI values for the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) were measured at the disc level C2/C3 through C6/C7 in 11 normal subjects and 10 subjects with CSM. Subjects with CSM were divided into two groups based on the extent of compression according to conventional MRI: single level (n=3) and multilevel (n=7). Intraoperative SCEPs were measured in subjects with CSM. For each group, the ADC and FA values were compared with SCEPs with respect to the segmental levels of dysfunction.
RESULTS: For all three subjects with single-level compression and six of seven with multilevel compression, the maximal ADC value was observed at the segmental level of dysfunction as per the SCEP. Minimum FA values were observed at those sites in two of three patients with single-level compression and in only two of seven with multi-level compression.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that ADC might serve as a supplementary diagnostic indicator of the segmental levels of dysfunction in CSM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26503221     DOI: 10.1038/sc.2015.192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  20 in total

1.  Diffusion tensor imaging in the cervical spinal cord.

Authors:  Ting Song; Wen-Jun Chen; Bo Yang; Hong-Pu Zhao; Jian-Wei Huang; Ming-Jin Cai; Tian-Fa Dong; Tang-Sheng Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Neurologic level diagnosis of cervical stenotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Atsushi Seichi; Katsushi Takeshita; Hiroshi Kawaguchi; Ko Matsudaira; Akiro Higashikawa; Naoshi Ogata; Kozo Nakamura
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Correlation Between Spinal Cord Function Assessed by Intraoperative SCEPs and Morphology of the Compressed Spinal Cord on MRI.

Authors:  Tsukasa Kanchiku; Yasuaki Imajo; Hidenori Suzuki; Yuichiro Yoshida; Kosuke Akashi; Toshihiko Taguchi
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.876

4.  A correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and electrophysiological findings in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  T Kanchiku; T Taguchi; K Kaneko; Y Fuchigami; H Yonemura; S Kawai
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Apparent diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy in spinal cord: age and cervical spondylosis-related changes.

Authors:  Hatsuho Mamata; Ferenc A Jolesz; Stephan E Maier
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  New diffusion metrics for spondylotic myelopathy at an early clinical stage.

Authors:  Masaaki Hori; Issei Fukunaga; Yoshitaka Masutani; Atsushi Nakanishi; Keigo Shimoji; Koji Kamagata; Koichi Asahi; Nozomi Hamasaki; Yuriko Suzuki; Shigeki Aoki
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Correlation between spinal cord compression and abnormal patterns of median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials in compressive cervical myelopathy: comparison of surface and epidurally recorded responses.

Authors:  K Kaneko; S Kawai; T Taguchi; Y Fuchigami; T Ito; H Morita
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1998-06-30       Impact factor: 3.181

8.  Correlation of magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging and clinical findings of cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Woo-Kyoung Yoo; Tae-Hwan Kim; Dinh-Mahn Hai; Shanmuga Sundaram; Young-Mi Yang; Moon Soo Park; Yong-Chan Kim; Yoon-Hae Kwak; Suk-Hoon Ohn; Seok Woo Kim
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 9.  A review of the pathophysiology of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with insights for potential novel mechanisms drawn from traumatic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  M G Fehlings; G Skaf
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Is diffusion anisotropy a biomarker for disease severity and surgical prognosis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy?

Authors:  Chun Yi Wen; Jiao Long Cui; Harris S Liu; Kin Cheung Mak; Wai Yuen Cheung; Keith D K Luk; Yong Hu
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  2 in total

1.  Recent Developments in Diffusion Tensor Imaging of Brain.

Authors:  Mansi Bharat Parekh; Abhijit Achyut Gurjarpadhye; Martin A C Manoukian; Arita Dubnika; Jayakumar Rajadas; Mohammed Inayathullah
Journal:  Radiol Open J       Date:  2015-12-11

2.  Predictors of symptomatic myelopathy in degenerative cervical spinal cord compression.

Authors:  Zdenek Kadanka; Blanka Adamova; Milos Kerkovsky; Zdenek Kadanka; Ladislav Dusek; Barbora Jurova; Eva Vlckova; Josef Bednarik
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 2.708

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.