INTRODUCTION: Recent developments of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) make it possible to image malignant tumors to provide tissue contrast based on difference in the diffusion of water molecules among tissues, which can be measured by apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value. The aim of this study is to examine the usefulness of DWI for benign/malignant discrimination of pulmonary nodules/masses compared with F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET). METHODS: PET and DWI were carried out prospectively in 104 patients with 140 pulmonary nodules/masses before surgery. FDG uptake of each lesion was quantitatively measured by a contrast ratio of standard uptake value (SUV-CR) between the lesions and contralateral lung. Diffusion of water molecule in each lesion was quantitatively measured by a minimum ADC (ADC-min). The diagnostic results were compared between the two modalities. RESULTS: The receiver operating characteristics curve showed cutoff values of the ADC-min and the SUV-CR for benign/malignant discrimination to be 1.1 x 10 mm/s and 0.37, respectively. DWI and PET showed sensitivities of 0.70 and 0.72 and specificities of 0.97 and 0.79, respectively. Although there was no significant difference in sensitivity between the two methods, DWI showed a significantly higher specificity than PET because of fewer false-positives for active inflammatory lesions (p = 0.03). The ADC-min and SUV-CR values showed a significant reverse correlation (r = -0.504, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: DWI may be able to be used in place of FDG-PET to distinguish malignant from benign pulmonary nodules/masses with fewer false-positive results compared with FDG-PET.
INTRODUCTION: Recent developments of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) make it possible to image malignant tumors to provide tissue contrast based on difference in the diffusion of water molecules among tissues, which can be measured by apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value. The aim of this study is to examine the usefulness of DWI for benign/malignant discrimination of pulmonary nodules/masses compared with F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET). METHODS: PET and DWI were carried out prospectively in 104 patients with 140 pulmonary nodules/masses before surgery. FDG uptake of each lesion was quantitatively measured by a contrast ratio of standard uptake value (SUV-CR) between the lesions and contralateral lung. Diffusion of water molecule in each lesion was quantitatively measured by a minimum ADC (ADC-min). The diagnostic results were compared between the two modalities. RESULTS: The receiver operating characteristics curve showed cutoff values of the ADC-min and the SUV-CR for benign/malignant discrimination to be 1.1 x 10 mm/s and 0.37, respectively. DWI and PET showed sensitivities of 0.70 and 0.72 and specificities of 0.97 and 0.79, respectively. Although there was no significant difference in sensitivity between the two methods, DWI showed a significantly higher specificity than PET because of fewer false-positives for active inflammatory lesions (p = 0.03). The ADC-min and SUV-CR values showed a significant reverse correlation (r = -0.504, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: DWI may be able to be used in place of FDG-PET to distinguish malignant from benign pulmonary nodules/masses with fewer false-positive results compared with FDG-PET.
Authors: Johan Coolen; Johan Vansteenkiste; Frederik De Keyzer; Herbert Decaluwé; Walter De Wever; Christophe Deroose; Christophe Dooms; Eric Verbeken; Paul De Leyn; Vincent Vandecaveye; Dirk Van Raemdonck; Kristiaan Nackaerts; Steven Dymarkowski; Johny Verschakelen Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-10-31 Impact factor: 5.315