Literature DB >> 18378926

Transferring simulated arthroscopic skills to the operating theatre: a randomised blinded study.

N R Howells1, H S Gill, A J Carr, A J Price, J L Rees.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of laboratory-based simulator training on the ability of surgical trainees to perform diagnostic arthroscopy of the knee. A total of 20 junior orthopaedic trainees were randomised to receive either a fixed protocol of arthroscopic simulator training on a bench-top knee simulator or no additional training. Motion analysis was used to assess performance objectively. Each trainee then received traditional instruction and demonstrations of diagnostic arthroscopy of the knee in theatre before performing the procedure under the supervision of a blinded consultant trainer. Their performance was assessed using a procedure-based assessment from the Orthopaedic Competence Assessment Project and a five-point global rating assessment scale. In theatre the simulator-trained group performed significantly better than the untrained group using the Orthopaedic Competence Assessment Project score (p = 0.0007) and assessment by the global rating scale (p = 0.0011), demonstrating the transfer of psychomotor skills from simulator training to arthroscopy in the operating theatre. This has implications for the planning of future training curricula.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18378926     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B4.20414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  74 in total

1.  Global Rating Scales and Motion Analysis Are Valid Proficiency Metrics in Virtual and Benchtop Knee Arthroscopy Simulators.

Authors:  Justues Chang; Daniel C Banaszek; Jason Gambrel; Davide Bardana
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Newly acquired arthroscopic skills: Are they transferable during simulator training of other joints?

Authors:  Jamie Ferguson; Robert Middleton; Abtin Alvand; Jonathan Rees
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Can an Augmented Reality Headset Improve Accuracy of Acetabular Cup Orientation in Simulated THA? A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Kartik Logishetty; Luke Western; Ruairidh Morgan; Farhad Iranpour; Justin P Cobb; Edouard Auvinet
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Education in wrist arthroscopy: past, present and future.

Authors:  M C Obdeijn; N Bavinck; C Mathoulin; C M A M van der Horst; M P Schijven; G J M Tuijthof
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  ACGME and ABOS changes for the orthopaedic surgery PGY-1 (intern) year.

Authors:  Paul J Dougherty; Randall E Marcus
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Using the arthroscopic surgery skill evaluation tool as a pass-fail examination.

Authors:  Ryan J Koehler; Gregg T Nicandri
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  How orthopaedic residents perceive educational resources.

Authors:  Brian R Wolf; Carla L Britton
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2013

8.  Validation of the ArthroS virtual reality simulator for arthroscopic skills.

Authors:  J J Stunt; G M M J Kerkhoffs; C N van Dijk; G J M Tuijthof
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Simulation in shoulder surgery.

Authors:  Henry B Colaço; Duncan Tennent
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-09-09

10.  Character, Incidence, and Predictors of Knee Pain and Activity After Infrapatellar Intramedullary Nailing of an Isolated Tibia Fracture.

Authors:  William Obremskey; Julie Agel; Kristin Archer; Philip To; Paul Tornetta
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.512

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.