OBJECTIVES: Benzodiazepines are excluded from prescription drug coverage under Medicare Part D. The objectives of this study were twofold: to provide national estimates of benzodiazepine utilization and expenditure patterns and to examine the impact of drug coverage and other factors associated with utilization of benzodiazepines and potential benzodiazepine substitute classes. METHODS: The 2002 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey provided national estimates of benzodiazepine use and expenditures among Medicare beneficiaries. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to assess the relationships between independent variables and use of benzodiazepines and potential substitute classes. The independent variable of interest was drug coverage, assessed by payer source. Other covariates included in the models were chronic conditions associated with benzodiazepine use, age, sex, race, and income. RESULTS: In 2002, 13.7% of Medicare beneficiaries received at least one benzodiazepine fill, with an average of 5.8 benzodiazepine prescriptions filled at an annual cost of 190 dollars. Specific sources of prescription drug coverage were not significantly associated with benzodiazepine use. Female gender, chronic mental illness, age under 65, and lower income were significantly positively associated with benzodiazepine use in the Medicare population, whereas black and other races were significantly negatively associated with benzodiazepine use in this population. Compared with Medicare beneficiaries without supplemental drug coverage, beneficiaries with supplemental drug coverage were more likely to use potential benzodiazepine substitute classes than benzodiazepines. CONCLUSIONS: Benzodiazepines were widely used by Medicare beneficiaries. Drug coverage influences access to benzodiazepines and potential substitute classes. These findings have important implications for identifying beneficiaries potentially affected by the exclusion of benzodiazepine coverage under Medicare Part D.
OBJECTIVES:Benzodiazepines are excluded from prescription drug coverage under Medicare Part D. The objectives of this study were twofold: to provide national estimates of benzodiazepine utilization and expenditure patterns and to examine the impact of drug coverage and other factors associated with utilization of benzodiazepines and potential benzodiazepine substitute classes. METHODS: The 2002 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey provided national estimates of benzodiazepine use and expenditures among Medicare beneficiaries. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to assess the relationships between independent variables and use of benzodiazepines and potential substitute classes. The independent variable of interest was drug coverage, assessed by payer source. Other covariates included in the models were chronic conditions associated with benzodiazepine use, age, sex, race, and income. RESULTS: In 2002, 13.7% of Medicare beneficiaries received at least one benzodiazepine fill, with an average of 5.8 benzodiazepine prescriptions filled at an annual cost of 190 dollars. Specific sources of prescription drug coverage were not significantly associated with benzodiazepine use. Female gender, chronic mental illness, age under 65, and lower income were significantly positively associated with benzodiazepine use in the Medicare population, whereas black and other races were significantly negatively associated with benzodiazepine use in this population. Compared with Medicare beneficiaries without supplemental drug coverage, beneficiaries with supplemental drug coverage were more likely to use potential benzodiazepine substitute classes than benzodiazepines. CONCLUSIONS:Benzodiazepines were widely used by Medicare beneficiaries. Drug coverage influences access to benzodiazepines and potential substitute classes. These findings have important implications for identifying beneficiaries potentially affected by the exclusion of benzodiazepine coverage under Medicare Part D.
Authors: Linda Simoni-Wastila; Ilene H Zuckerman; Thomas Shaffer; Christopher M Blanchette; Bruce Stuart Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Dennis Ross-Degnan; Linda Simoni-Wastila; Jeffrey S Brown; Xiaoming Gao; Connie Mah; Leon E Cosler; Thomas Fanning; Peter Gallagher; Carl Salzman; Richard I Shader; Thomas S Inui; Stephen B Soumerai Journal: Int J Psychiatry Med Date: 2004 Impact factor: 1.210
Authors: Anita K Wagner; Fang Zhang; Stephen B Soumerai; Alexander M Walker; Jerry H Gurwitz; Robert J Glynn; Dennis Ross-Degnan Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2004-07-26
Authors: Gregory C Pope; John Kautter; Randall P Ellis; Arlene S Ash; John Z Ayanian; Lisa I Lezzoni; Melvin J Ingber; Jesse M Levy; John Robst Journal: Health Care Financ Rev Date: 2004
Authors: Susan A Hall; Gretchen R Chiu; David W Kaufman; Judith P Kelly; Carol L Link; Varant Kupelian; John B McKinlay Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Matthew E Hirschtritt; Vanessa A Palzes; Andrea H Kline-Simon; Kurt Kroenke; Cynthia I Campbell; Stacy A Sterling Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2019-12-01 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Daniel F Weisberg; Kirsha S Gordon; Declan T Barry; William C Becker; Stephen Crystal; Eva J Edelman; Julie Gaither; Adam J Gordon; Joseph Goulet; Robert D Kerns; Brent A Moore; Janet Tate; Amy C Justice; David A Fiellin Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2015-06-01 Impact factor: 3.771