Literature DB >> 15328327

Cost-lowering strategies used by medicare beneficiaries who exceed drug benefit caps and have a gap in drug coverage.

Chien-Wen Tseng1, Robert H Brook, Emmett Keeler, W Neil Steers, Carol M Mangione.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The majority of Medicare drug benefits in managed care (Medicare + Choice) have annual dollar limits or caps and many beneficiaries face temporary but potentially significant gaps in coverage after exceeding caps before the end of the year. In the new national Medicare drug benefit, beneficiaries with high medication expenditures will also face a period without drug coverage when their total drug costs exceed annual caps but are not high enough to qualify for catastrophic coverage.
OBJECTIVE: To describe strategies adopted by beneficiaries exceeding annual drug benefit caps to lower prescription costs, the type of medications involved, and their financial burden. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A survey (completed in 2002) of Medicare + Choice beneficiaries aged 65 years and older with high medication costs and benefits capped on the plan's share of drug costs (65% response rate). The different caps offered in different counties were used as a natural experiment. Study participants (n = 665) exceeded a 750 dollars or 1200 dollars yearly cap in 2001 and had coverage gaps of 75 to 180 days. Control participants (n = 643) had 2000 dollars caps, which they did not exceed. Study and control participants were matched by average total drug expenditures per month. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of beneficiaries reporting specific strategies to decrease medication costs, medications affected, and difficulty paying for prescriptions.
RESULTS: In multivariate analyses adjusting for demographic and health characteristics, a higher proportion of patients exceeding caps reported using less prescribed medication than controls (18% vs 10%, respectively; P<.001), but similar proportions reported stopping medications completely (8% for both, P =.86) and of not starting prescribed medications (6% vs 5%, P =.39). Patients exceeding caps more often called pharmacies to find the best price (46% vs 29%, P<.001), switched medications (15% vs 9%, P =.002), used samples (34% vs 27%, P =.006), and had difficulty paying for prescriptions (62% vs 37%, P<.001). Twelve of the 20 therapeutic classes most often affected by decreases in use of medication were for chronic health problems such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and emphysema or asthma.
CONCLUSIONS: Medicare beneficiaries often decreased use of essential medications and experienced difficulty paying for prescriptions during gaps in coverage. Health professionals need to explore how they can lessen the impact of caps on patients' health and financial burden.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15328327     DOI: 10.1001/jama.292.8.952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  36 in total

1.  How patient cost-sharing trends affect adherence and outcomes: a literature review.

Authors:  Michael T Eaddy; Christopher L Cook; Ken O'Day; Steven P Burch; C Ron Cantrell
Journal:  P T       Date:  2012-01

2.  Is bigger better? An argument for very low starting doses.

Authors:  James P McCormack; G Michael Allan; Adil S Virani
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Provider views about responsibility for medication adherence and content of physician-older patient discussions.

Authors:  Derjung M Tarn; Thomas J Mattimore; Douglas S Bell; Richard L Kravitz; Neil S Wenger
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  Pharmaceutical cost management and access to psychotropic drugs: the U.S. context.

Authors:  Haiden A Huskamp
Journal:  Int J Law Psychiatry       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct

5.  Race/ethnicity and nonadherence to prescription medications among seniors: results of a national study.

Authors:  Walid F Gellad; Jennifer S Haas; Dana Gelb Safran
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Effect of an expenditure cap on low-income seniors' drug use and spending in a state pharmacy assistance program.

Authors:  Christine E Bishop; Andrew M Ryan; Daniel M Gilden; Joanna Kubisiak; Cindy Parks Thomas
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Coverage of atypical antipsychotics among medicare drug plans in the state of washington: changes between 2007 and 2008.

Authors:  Meng-Yun Wu; Jae Kennedy; Lawrence J Cohen; Chi-Chuan Wang
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2009

8.  Factors influencing cost-related nonadherence to medication in older adults: a conceptually based approach.

Authors:  Kara Zivin; Scott Ratliff; Michele M Heisler; Kenneth M Langa; John D Piette
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 5.725

9.  Cost-related nonadherence by medication type among Medicare Part D beneficiaries with diabetes.

Authors:  Jessica Williams; William N Steers; Susan L Ettner; Carol M Mangione; Obidiugwu K Duru
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Falling into the coverage gap: Part D drug costs and adherence for Medicare Advantage prescription drug plan beneficiaries with diabetes.

Authors:  Vicki Fung; Carol M Mangione; Jie Huang; Norman Turk; Elaine S Quiter; Julie A Schmittdiel; John Hsu
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.