Literature DB >> 18378520

Telmisartan, ramipril, or both in patients at high risk for vascular events.

Salim Yusuf, Koon K Teo, Janice Pogue, Leanne Dyal, Ingrid Copland, Helmut Schumacher, Gilles Dagenais, Peter Sleight, Craig Anderson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In patients who have vascular disease or high-risk diabetes without heart failure, angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors reduce mortality and morbidity from cardiovascular causes, but the role of angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) in such patients is unknown. We compared the ACE inhibitor ramipril, the ARB telmisartan, and the combination of the two drugs in patients with vascular disease or high-risk diabetes.
METHODS: After a 3-week, single-blind run-in period, patients underwent double-blind randomization, with 8576 assigned to receive 10 mg of ramipril per day, 8542 assigned to receive 80 mg of telmisartan per day, and 8502 assigned to receive both drugs (combination therapy). The primary composite outcome was death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure.
RESULTS: Mean blood pressure was lower in both the telmisartan group (a 0.9/0.6 mm Hg greater reduction) and the combination-therapy group (a 2.4/1.4 mm Hg greater reduction) than in the ramipril group. At a median follow-up of 56 months, the primary outcome had occurred in 1412 patients in the ramipril group (16.5%), as compared with 1423 patients in the telmisartan group (16.7%; relative risk, 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94 to 1.09). As compared with the ramipril group, the telmisartan group had lower rates of cough (1.1% vs. 4.2%, P<0.001) and angioedema (0.1% vs. 0.3%, P=0.01) and a higher rate of hypotensive symptoms (2.6% vs. 1.7%, P<0.001); the rate of syncope was the same in the two groups (0.2%). In the combination-therapy group, the primary outcome occurred in 1386 patients (16.3%; relative risk, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.07); as compared with the ramipril group, there was an increased risk of hypotensive symptoms (4.8% vs. 1.7%, P<0.001), syncope (0.3% vs. 0.2%, P=0.03), and renal dysfunction (13.5% vs. 10.2%, P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Telmisartan was equivalent to ramipril in patients with vascular disease or high-risk diabetes and was associated with less angioedema. The combination of the two drugs was associated with more adverse events without an increase in benefit. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00153101 [ClinicalTrials.gov].). Copyright 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18378520     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0801317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  817 in total

Review 1.  The benefit of angiotensin AT1 receptor blockers for early treatment of hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Bruno Trimarco; Ciro Santoro; Marco Pepe; Maurizio Galderisi
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 2.  Should two-drug initial therapy for hypertension be recommended for all patients?

Authors:  Jennifer B Cowart; Addison A Taylor
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.369

3.  Inclusion of stroke as an outcome and risk equivalent in risk scores for primary and secondary prevention of vascular disease.

Authors:  Mandip S Dhamoon; Mitchell S V Elkind
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Approach to cardiovascular disease prevention in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Cristina Karohl; Paolo Raggi
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2012-08

5.  [Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor induced angioedema : new therapy options].

Authors:  M Bas; G Kojda; K Stelter
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Effects of telmisartan on markers of ventricular remodeling in patients with acute myocardial infarction: comparison with enalapril.

Authors:  Takashi Yokota; Tomohiro Osanai; Kenji Hanada; Motoi Kushibiki; Naoki Abe; Koichi Oikawa; Hirofumi Tomita; Takumi Higuma; Jin Yokoyama; Hiroyuki Hanada; Ken Okumura
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 7.  Rationale for the use of a fixed-dose combination in the management of hypertension: efficacy and tolerability of lercanidipine/enalapril.

Authors:  Claudio Borghi; Arrigo F G Cicero
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 8.  An evolving story of angiotensin-II-forming pathways in rodents and humans.

Authors:  Carlos Maria Ferrario; Sarfaraz Ahmad; Sayaka Nagata; Stephen W Simington; Jasmina Varagic; Neal Kon; Louis Joseph Dell'italia
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.124

9.  RAS-Mediated Adaptive Mechanisms in Cardiovascular Tissues: Confounding Factors of RAS Blockade Therapy and Alternative Approaches.

Authors:  Rukhsana Gul; Maya Ramdas; Chirag H Mandavia; James R Sowers; Lakshmi Pulakat
Journal:  Cardiorenal Med       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 2.041

Review 10.  Type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension: an update.

Authors:  Guido Lastra; Sofia Syed; L Romayne Kurukulasuriya; Camila Manrique; James R Sowers
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 4.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.