Literature DB >> 18378371

Best research--for what? Best health--for whom? A critical exploration of primary care research using discourse analysis.

Sara E Shaw1, Trisha Greenhalgh.   

Abstract

Health research is fundamental to the development of improved health and healthcare. Despite its importance, and the role of policy in guiding the kind of research that gets addressed, there are very few empirical studies of health research policy. This paper redresses this, exploring the means by which one area of health research policy is shaped, enabled and constrained. We ask: what are the historical, social and political origins of research policy in primary care in England? What are the key discourses that have dominated debate; and what are the tensions between discourses and the implications this raises for practitioners and policymakers? To answer these questions we employed a Foucauldian approach to discourse analysis to explicitly recognise the historical, social and ideological origins of policy texts; and the role of power and knowledge in policy development. We adapted Parker's framework for distinguishing discourses as a means of selecting and analysing 29 key policy documents; 16 narrative interviews with historical and contemporary policy stakeholders; and additional contextual documents. Our analysis involved detailed deconstruction and linking across texts to reveal prevailing storylines, ideologies, power relations, and tensions. Findings show how powerful policy discourses shaped by historical and social forces influence the type of research undertaken, by whom and how. For instance, recent policy has been shaped by discourse associated with the knowledge-based economy that emphasises microscopic 'discovery', exploitation of information and the contribution of highly technological activities to 'UK plc' and has re-positioned primary care research as a strategic resource and 'population laboratory' for clinical research. Such insights challenge apolitical accounts of health research and reveal how health research serves particular interests.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18378371     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.02.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  10 in total

1.  Galvanizers, guides, champions, and shields: the many ways that policymakers use public health researchers.

Authors:  Abby S Haynes; James A Gillespie; Gemma E Derrick; Wayne D Hall; Sally Redman; Simon Chapman; Heidi Sturk
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Health care innovation: Working with General Practitioners.

Authors:  Moyez Jiwa
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2013-01-31

3.  Refocusing knowledge generation, application, and education: raising our gaze to promote health across boundaries.

Authors:  Kurt C Stange
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Intensive spa and exercise therapy program for returning to work for low back pain patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Christelle Nguyen; Isabelle Boutron; Christopher Rein; Gabriel Baron; Katherine Sanchez; Clémence Palazzo; Arnaud Dupeyron; Jean-Max Tessier; Emmanuel Coudeyre; Bénédicte Eschalier; Romain Forestier; Christian-François Roques-Latrille; Ygal Attal; Marie-Martine Lefèvre-Colau; François Rannou; Serge Poiraudeau
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Accelerating Innovation in the Creation of Biovalue: The Cell and Gene Therapy Catapult.

Authors:  John Gardner; Andrew Webster
Journal:  Sci Technol Human Values       Date:  2017-04-06

6.  Re-positioning faculty development as knowledge mobilization for health professions education.

Authors:  Stella L Ng; Lindsay R Baker; Karen Leslie
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2017-08

7.  The Possibilities and Limits of "Co-producing" Research.

Authors:  Jonathan Paylor; Christopher McKevitt
Journal:  Front Sociol       Date:  2019-04-05

8.  Discourse analysis: what is it and why is it relevant to family practice?

Authors:  Sara E Shaw; Julia Bailey
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 2.267

Review 9.  General practice-based clinical trials in Germany - a problem analysis.

Authors:  Eva Hummers-Pradier; Jutta Bleidorn; Guido Schmiemann; Stefanie Joos; Annette Becker; Attila Altiner; Jean-François Chenot; Martin Scherer
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Reimagining Health as a 'Flow on Effect' of Biomedical Innovation: Research Policy as a Site of State Activism.

Authors:  Georgia Miller; Declan Kuch; Matthew Kearnes
Journal:  Minerva       Date:  2022-01-18
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.