Literature DB >> 18375679

The claim for patient choice and equity.

D A Barr1, L Fenton, D Blane.   

Abstract

Recently, commentators close to and within the UK government have claimed that patient choice can increase equity in the context of the National Health Service. This article critically examines the basis for this claim through analysis of recent speeches and publications authored by secretaries of state for health and their policy advisers. It is concluded that this claim has not developed prospectively from an analysis of the causes of healthcare inequity, or even with a consistent normative definition of equity. The limited justification that is "framed in causal explanations" of inequity has suffered from an apparent disregard of the available evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18375679     DOI: 10.1136/jme.2006.019570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  5 in total

1.  The fallacy of choice in the common law and NHS policy.

Authors:  Ingrid Whiteman
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2013-06

2.  Fallacy or Functionality: Law and Policy of Patient Treatment Choice in the NHS.

Authors:  Maria K Sheppard
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2016-12

3.  Changes in health care utilisation following a reform involving choice and privatisation in Swedish primary care: a five-year follow-up of GP-visits.

Authors:  Anders Beckman; Anders Anell
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Equity, waiting times, and NHS reforms: retrospective study.

Authors:  Zachary N Cooper; Alistair McGuire; S Jones; J Le Grand
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-09-03

5.  Patients' experience of being triaged directly to a psychologist in primary care: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Linda Dahlöf; Anna Simonsson; Jörgen Thorn; Maria Eh Larsson
Journal:  Prim Health Care Res Dev       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 1.458

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.