Literature DB >> 18374961

Priming in visual search: separating the effects of target repetition, distractor repetition and role-reversal.

Arni Kristjánsson1, Jon Driver.   

Abstract

Recent studies have identified between-trial priming effects in visual search tasks, but often with constraints on the possible similarities or changes across successive trials, and usually with the main emphasis on effects of target repetition. Here we sought to obtain a more thorough characterization of between-trial priming effects in speeded visual search, where observers determined target presence or absence among a set of distractors. The results show that various separable priming effects have a major influence on visual search performance. Facilitation was evident when a target was repeated between-trials, but there was also strong priming due to repetition of distractor types, even between successive trials for which no target was presented on either trial. Search also proceeded faster if the same distractor types were repeated, even when the current target was different from the preceding target. We also investigated the possible impact of role-reversals for particular display items, from being a target on one trial to becoming a distractor on the next, and vice-versa. We find that such role-reversals substantially affect search performance, over and above the effects of repetition per se when those were held constant.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18374961     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  36 in total

1.  How visual working memory contents influence priming of visual attention.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle; Árni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-04-12

2.  Independent and additive repetition priming of motion direction and color in visual search.

Authors:  Arni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-12-09

3.  Incidental learning speeds visual search by lowering response thresholds, not by improving efficiency: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Temporal Characteristics of Priming of Attention Shifts Are Mirrored by BOLD Response Patterns in the Frontoparietal Attention Network.

Authors:  Manje A B Brinkhuis; Árni Kristjánsson; Ben M Harvey; Jan W Brascamp
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Is interpolation cognitively encapsulated? Measuring the effects of belief on Kanizsa shape discrimination and illusory contour formation.

Authors:  Brian P Keane; Hongjing Lu; Thomas V Papathomas; Steven M Silverstein; Philip J Kellman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-03-20

6.  Response retrieval in a go/no-go priming-of-popout task.

Authors:  Bryan R Burnham
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

7.  Neural Evidence for the Contribution of Active Suppression During Working Memory Filtering.

Authors:  Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Deciding where to attend: priming of pop-out drives target selection.

Authors:  Jan W Brascamp; Randolph Blake; Árni Kristjánsson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Temporal consistency is currency in shifts of transient visual attention.

Authors:  Arni Kristjánsson; Katrín Ósk Eyjólfsdóttir; Anna Jónsdóttir; Guðmundur Arnkelsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Priming of pop-out modulates attentional target selection in visual search: behavioural and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Martin Eimer; Monika Kiss; Theodore Cheung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.