Literature DB >> 18374267

Using case-control studies to assess the prevention of inflicted traumatic brain injury.

Eugene D Shapiro1.   

Abstract

Because the incidence of inflicted traumatic brain injury (inflicted TBI) is low, even in populations at increased risk, very large samples are necessary to have adequate statistical power to conduct a randomized clinical trial of the effectiveness of a potential intervention to prevent inflicted TBI. This requirement for large samples, in addition to the logistic demands of prospective clinical trials, makes it prohibitively expensive to conduct such studies. Case-control studies provide a statistically efficient and logistically and economically feasible alternative approach to evaluating such interventions. However, because these are observational studies, they are susceptible to bias. Approaches are presented to conducting and analyzing case-control studies to evaluate interventions to prevent inflicted TBI while assessing and minimizing possible bias.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18374267      PMCID: PMC2390844          DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.01.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  10 in total

1.  Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs.

Authors:  J Concato; N Shah; R I Horwitz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-06-22       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease.

Authors:  N MANTEL; W HAENSZEL
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Long-term efficacy of sigmoidoscopy in the reduction of colorectal cancer incidence.

Authors:  Polly A Newcomb; Barry E Storer; Libby M Morimoto; Allyson Templeton; John D Potter
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-04-16       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  A method of estimating comparative rates from clinical data; applications to cancer of the lung, breast, and cervix.

Authors:  J CORNFIELD
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1951-06       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Bias in analytic research.

Authors:  D L Sackett
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1979

Review 6.  Resolving the pneumococcal vaccine controversy: are there alternatives to randomized clinical trials?

Authors:  J D Clemens; E D Shapiro
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1984 Sep-Oct

7.  Detection bias and relation of benign breast disease to breast cancer.

Authors:  A L Silber; R I Horwitz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-03-22       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  The protective efficacy of polyvalent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine.

Authors:  E D Shapiro; A T Berg; R Austrian; D Schroeder; V Parcells; A Margolis; R K Adair; J D Clemens
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-11-21       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Case-control studies of the effectiveness of vaccines: validity and assessment of potential bias.

Authors:  Eugene D Shapiro
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  An analysis of Berkson's bias in case-control studies.

Authors:  A R Feinstein; S D Walter; R I Horwitz
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1986
  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Effectiveness of long-lasting insecticidal nets in prevention of malaria among individuals visiting health centres in Ziway-Dugda District, Ethiopia: matched case-control study.

Authors:  Mesfin Kelkile Wubishet; Gebretsadik Berhe; Alefech Adissu; Mesfin Segni Tafa
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 2.979

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.