Literature DB >> 18373628

Determinants of the strength of disruptive and/or divergent selection arising from resource competition.

Peter A Abrams1,2, Claus Rueffler1,3, Gary Kim1,4.   

Abstract

We investigate how the intensity of competition for resources affects the strength of disruptive selection on a resource acquisition trait. This is done by analyzing several consumer-resource models in which consumers use a linear array of resources. We show that disruptive selection can be diminished under both strong and weak competition, making disruptive selection a unimodal function of the strength of competition. Weak selection under strong competition arises when competition causes the extinction (for self-reproducing resources) or depletion (for abiotic resources) of the most rapidly caught resources. Weak selection under weak competition is a consequence of minimal effects of consumers on resources. The precise relationship between intensity of competition and strength of disruptive selection is sensitive to the shape of the consumer's resource utilization curve and the nature of resource growth. The most strongly unimodal competition-selection relationships result from utilization curves with long tails. Our results show that a simple comparison of the width of the resource abundance distribution and the consumer's utilization function is not sufficient to determine whether selection is disruptive. The results may explain some contradictory experimental findings regarding the effect of consumer mortality on the strength of disruptive selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18373628     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00385.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  7 in total

Review 1.  Fitness consequences of plants growing with siblings: reconciling kin selection, niche partitioning and competitive ability.

Authors:  Amanda L File; Guillermo P Murphy; Susan A Dudley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Intraspecific genetic variation and competition interact to influence niche expansion.

Authors:  Deepa Agashe; Daniel I Bolnick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Disruptive selection in a bimodal population of Darwin's finches.

Authors:  Andrew P Hendry; Sarah K Huber; Luis F De León; Anthony Herrel; Jeffrey Podos
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Does intraspecific competition promote variation? A test via synthesis.

Authors:  Andrew W Jones; David M Post
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Phenotypic and genetic integration of personality and growth under competition in the sheepshead swordtail, Xiphophorus birchmanni.

Authors:  Kay Boulton; Craig A Walling; Andrew J Grimmer; Gil G Rosenthal; Alastair J Wilson
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  The enrichment paradox in adaptive radiations: Emergence of predators hinders diversification in resource rich environments.

Authors:  P Catalina Chaparro-Pedraza; Gregory Roth; Ole Seehausen
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 11.274

7.  Widespread disruptive selection in the wild is associated with intense resource competition.

Authors:  Ryan A Martin; David W Pfennig
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 3.260

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.