BACKGROUND: Impaired physical fitness, a contributor to obesity and cardiovascular disease, has been associated with both an individual's socioeconomic status (SES) and with residence in disadvantaged neighborhoods. The aim of the study was to examine the extent to which neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with impaired fitness, independent of clinical characteristics and individual-level SES. METHODS: Two thousand five hundred five participants 25 to 42 years old examined in the CARDIA study from 1992 to 1993 underwent symptom-limited exercise stress testing. Physical fitness was considered impaired if metabolic equivalents were in the lowest sex-specific quintile. Neighborhood SES was determined for each census tract using 1990 census data. Generalized estimating equations assessed the association between neighborhood SES and physical fitness, before and after adjustments for individual SES, sociodemographic, and clinical characteristics, and accounted for clustering within census tracts. RESULTS: Individuals in disadvantaged neighborhoods had lower educational attainment and income, and were more likely unemployed, black, and uninsured. The odds ratio (95% CI) for impaired physical fitness in the lowest vs highest tertile of neighborhood SES was 5.8 (3.7-7.3). These became 3.9 (2.7-5.7) after adjusting for individuals' educational attainment, personal income, employment status, and ability to pay for basic needs; and 1.9 (1.2-2.9) after additional adjustment for other sociodemographic and clinical factors. CONCLUSIONS: Features of one's neighborhood of residence are relevant to cardiovascular health. A health policy perspective that looks beyond an individual's characteristics may therefore be useful in identifying more effective interventions to reduce the prevalence of low physical fitness and its consequences in young adults.
BACKGROUND:Impaired physical fitness, a contributor to obesity and cardiovascular disease, has been associated with both an individual's socioeconomic status (SES) and with residence in disadvantaged neighborhoods. The aim of the study was to examine the extent to which neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with impaired fitness, independent of clinical characteristics and individual-level SES. METHODS: Two thousand five hundred five participants 25 to 42 years old examined in the CARDIA study from 1992 to 1993 underwent symptom-limited exercise stress testing. Physical fitness was considered impaired if metabolic equivalents were in the lowest sex-specific quintile. Neighborhood SES was determined for each census tract using 1990 census data. Generalized estimating equations assessed the association between neighborhood SES and physical fitness, before and after adjustments for individual SES, sociodemographic, and clinical characteristics, and accounted for clustering within census tracts. RESULTS: Individuals in disadvantaged neighborhoods had lower educational attainment and income, and were more likely unemployed, black, and uninsured. The odds ratio (95% CI) for impaired physical fitness in the lowest vs highest tertile of neighborhood SES was 5.8 (3.7-7.3). These became 3.9 (2.7-5.7) after adjusting for individuals' educational attainment, personal income, employment status, and ability to pay for basic needs; and 1.9 (1.2-2.9) after additional adjustment for other sociodemographic and clinical factors. CONCLUSIONS: Features of one's neighborhood of residence are relevant to cardiovascular health. A health policy perspective that looks beyond an individual's characteristics may therefore be useful in identifying more effective interventions to reduce the prevalence of low physical fitness and its consequences in young adults.
Authors: Sue Y S Kimm; Nancy W Glynn; Andrea M Kriska; Bruce A Barton; Shari S Kronsberg; Stephen R Daniels; Patricia B Crawford; Zak I Sabry; Kiang Liu Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-09-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: A V Diez Roux; S S Merkin; D Arnett; L Chambless; M Massing; F J Nieto; P Sorlie; M Szklo; H A Tyroler; R L Watson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-07-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: JoAnn E Manson; Philip Greenland; Andrea Z LaCroix; Marcia L Stefanick; Charles P Mouton; Albert Oberman; Michael G Perri; David S Sheps; Mary B Pettinger; David S Siscovick Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-09-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Janne Boone-Heinonen; Ana V Diez Roux; Catarina I Kiefe; Cora E Lewis; David K Guilkey; Penny Gordon-Larsen Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2011-01-25 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Allison R Webel; Trevor Jenkins; Christopher T Longenecker; Marianne Vest; Christine Horvat Davey; Jackson Currie; Rebecca Darrah; Paul Litman; Vitor Hugo Fernando de Oliveira; Richard A Josephson Journal: J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care Date: 2019 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.354
Authors: Jordan B Stoecker; Jordana B Cohen; Nathan Belkin; Jing C Chen; Raymond R Townsend; Dawei Xie; Harold I Feldman; Grace J Wang Journal: Ann Vasc Surg Date: 2021-10-14 Impact factor: 1.466
Authors: Erin Unger; Ana V Diez-Roux; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Mahasin S Mujahid; Jennifer A Nettleton; Alain Bertoni; Sylvia E Badon; Hongyan Ning; Norrina B Allen Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2014-07
Authors: David A Alter; Barry Franklin; Dennis T Ko; Peter C Austin; Douglas S Lee; Paul I Oh; Therese A Stukel; Jack V Tu Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-06-03 Impact factor: 3.240