Literature DB >> 18370603

Selective attention to affective value alters how the brain processes olfactory stimuli.

Edmund T Rolls1, Fabian Grabenhorst, Christian Margot, Maria A A P da Silva, Maria Ines Velazco.   

Abstract

How does selective attention to affect influence sensory processing? In a functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation, when subjects were instructed to remember and rate the pleasantness of a jasmine odor, activations were greater in the medial orbito-frontal and pregenual cingulate cortex than when subjects were instructed to remember and rate the intensity of the odor. When the subjects were instructed to remember and rate the intensity, activations were greater in the inferior frontal gyrus. These top-down effects occurred not only during odor delivery but started in a preparation period after the instruction before odor delivery, and continued after termination of the odor in a short-term memory period. Thus, depending on the context in which odors are presented and whether affect is relevant, the brain prepares itself, responds to, and remembers an odor differently. These findings show that when attention is paid to affective value, the brain systems engaged to prepare for, represent, and remember a sensory stimulus are different from those engaged when attention is directed to the physical properties of a stimulus such as its intensity. This differential biasing of brain regions engaged in processing a sensory stimulus depending on whether the cognitive demand is for affect-related versus more sensory-related processing may be an important aspect of cognition and attention. This has many implications for understanding the effects not only of olfactory but also of other sensory stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18370603     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  19 in total

1.  Subconscious olfactory influences of stimulant and relaxant odors on immune function.

Authors:  Sokratis Trellakis; Cornelia Fischer; Alena Rydleuskaya; Sefik Tagay; Kirsten Bruderek; Jens Greve; Stephan Lang; Sven Brandau
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Toward a neurobiology of delusions.

Authors:  P R Corlett; J R Taylor; X-J Wang; P C Fletcher; J H Krystal
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 11.685

3.  Brain structural imaging correlates of olfactory dysfunction in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Authors:  Cinto Segalàs; Pino Alonso; Arantxa Orbegozo; Eva Real; Marta Subirà; Clara López-Solà; Ignacio Martínez-Zalacaín; Javier Labad; Ben J Harrison; Jesús Pujol; José M Menchón; Narcís Cardoner; Carles Soriano-Mas
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 5.270

4.  Odors: appetizing or satiating? Development of appetite during odor exposure over time.

Authors:  M G Ramaekers; S Boesveldt; C M M Lakemond; M A J S van Boekel; P A Luning
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 5.095

5.  Age-related functional changes in gustatory and reward processing regions: An fMRI study.

Authors:  Aaron Jacobson; Erin Green; Claire Murphy
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 6.  Assessment of direct knowledge of the human olfactory system.

Authors:  Gregory Lane; Guangyu Zhou; Torben Noto; Christina Zelano
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 5.330

7.  How task demands shape brain responses to visual food cues.

Authors:  Tanja Maria Pohl; Claus Tempelmann; Toemme Noesselt
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Cortical activity during olfactory stimulation in multiple chemical sensitivity: a (18)F-FDG PET/CT study.

Authors:  Agostino Chiaravalloti; Marco Pagani; Alessandro Micarelli; Barbara Di Pietro; Giuseppe Genovesi; Marco Alessandrini; Orazio Schillaci
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  The Effect of Swallowing Cues in Healthy Individuals: An Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Rachel W Mulheren; Ianessa A Humbert
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 3.438

10.  Effect of Magnitude Estimation of Pleasantness and Intensity on fMRI Activation to Taste.

Authors:  B Cerf-Ducastel; L Haase; C Murphy
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.833

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.