Literature DB >> 18370313

Tissue microarrays: an overview.

Rajiv Dhir1.   

Abstract

Traditionally, screening for new markers involves using a slide from each of several different patients. A more efficient way is to have one slide that contains several minute specimens, one from each patient. These slides are prepared by transferring paraffin tissue cores from many "donor" blocks to one "recipient" block. Each slide cut from this recipient block is called a tissue microarray (TMA) slide. It can have various histological types of disease that need to be compared or can have the same histological type but different behavior (e.g., responders versus non-responders, etc.). TMAs are ideal for efficient screening of prospective biomarkers by a variety of different mechanisms including immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization of nucleic acids (FISH) and RNA in situ hybridization. Selection and number of cases from patient subsets in a given microarray slide is amenable to statistical modeling to enhance analysis of results. In addition, different microarrays can be constructed to answer different scientific questions. The microarrays can also be produced from retrospective paraffin blocks of well-characterized cases, with clinical follow-up. The TMA slides can be "whole-slide" imaged. This provides a mechanism to share results of experiments with other investigators. There are also ongoing efforts to generate software tools for automated analysis of TMA localization data. There has also been a significant body of work done to standardize data capture, thus facilitating subsequent exchange of information. The preferred current mechanism is to use an "XLM"-based data capture and transfer. There have also been efforts to create "frozen" TMAs. This has been attempted using "donor" frozen tissues embedded in OCT compound. These samples are then arrayed into a recipient OCT block. The presence of OCT can sporadically interfere with certain assays. However, it does provide a novel mechanism for high-throughput evaluation of frozen tissue, with corresponding visualization of tissue morphology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18370313     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-60327-047-2_6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  7 in total

1.  SpOT the Correct Tissue Every Time in Multi-tissue Blocks.

Authors:  Anna Coffey; Michael D Johnson; Deborah L Berry
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  A comparison between manual and automated evaluations of tissue microarray patterns of protein expression.

Authors:  Arthur W Alvarenga; Claudia M Coutinho-Camillo; Bruna R Rodrigues; Rafael M Rocha; Luiz Fernando B Torres; Vilma R Martins; Isabela W da Cunha; Glaucia N M Hajj
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 2.479

3.  Breast Biomarkers-Comparison on Whole Section and Tissue Microarray Section.

Authors:  Sneha S Chavan; Savithri Ravindra; Msn Prasad
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-03-01

4.  Suppressive roles of calreticulin in prostate cancer growth and metastasis.

Authors:  Mahesh Alur; Minh M Nguyen; Scott E Eggener; Feng Jiang; Soheil S Dadras; Jeffrey Stern; Simon Kimm; Kim Roehl; James Kozlowski; Michael Pins; Marek Michalak; Rajiv Dhir; Zhou Wang
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 4.307

5.  A Simple Method for Creating a High-Content Microscope for Imaging Multiplexed Tissue Microarrays.

Authors:  Shabnam Abtahi; Neal R Gliksman; John F Heneghan; Steven P Nilsen; Jeremy L Muhlich; Jay Copeland; Emil Rozbicki; Chris Allan; Pradeep K Dudeja; Jerrold R Turner
Journal:  Curr Protoc       Date:  2021-04

6.  Automated ERCC1 immunochemistry on hybrid cytology/tissue microarray of malignant effusions: evaluation of antibodies 8F1 and D-10.

Authors:  Alex Soltermann; Sandra Kilgus-Hawelski; Silvia Behnke; Martina Storz; Holger Moch; Beata Bode
Journal:  J Clin Bioinforma       Date:  2011-09-30

7.  Development and validation of a protocol for optimizing the use of paraffin blocks in molecular epidemiological studies: The example from the HPV-AHEAD study.

Authors:  Marisa Mena; Belen Lloveras; Sara Tous; Johannes Bogers; Fausto Maffini; Nitin Gangane; Rekha Vijay Kumar; Thara Somanathan; Eric Lucas; Devasena Anantharaman; Tarik Gheit; Xavier Castellsagué; Michael Pawlita; Silvia de Sanjosé; Laia Alemany; Massimo Tommasino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.