Literature DB >> 18370072

Conditional gene trapping using the FLEx system.

Thomas Floss1, Frank Schnütgen.   

Abstract

The knowledge about the complete genome sequences of mouse, human, and other organisms is only the first step toward the functional annotation of all genes. It facilitates the recognition of sequence conservation, which helps to distinguish between important and not important and also coding from noncoding sequence. Nevertheless, approximately only 50% of all mouse genes have been entirely annotated to date. In the postgenomic era, large-scale projects have been initiated to describe also the expression (Emap, Eurexpress) and the function (International Gene Trap Consortium, Eucomm, Norcomm, Komp) of all mouse genes. By building up on these resources, the average amount of time starting from a gene-coding sequence to finally studying its function in a living organism or embryo, has shortened significantly within the last decade. Several recent developments, namely, in bioinformatics and gene synthesis but also in targeted and random mutagenesis have contributed to the current status. This chapter will highlight the milestones that have been undertaken in order to saturate the mouse genome with gene trap mutations. We have no intention to cover the entire field but will instead focus on most recent vectors and protocols, which have turned out to be most useful in order to promote the technology. Therefore, we apologize upfront to the many studies that could not be mentioned here solely owing to space limitations but which nevertheless made significant contributions to our current understanding. This chapter will finally provide guidance on possible uses of conditional gene trap alleles as well as detailed protocols for the application of this recent technology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18370072     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-59745-232-8_9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  7 in total

1.  Generating conditional mutations in zebrafish using gene-trap mutagenesis.

Authors:  Lisette A Maddison; Jianjun Lu; Wenbiao Chen
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.441

2.  Efficient conditional and promoter-specific in vivo expression of cDNAs of choice by taking advantage of recombinase-mediated cassette exchange using FlEx gene traps.

Authors:  Laura Schebelle; Claudia Wolf; Carola Stribl; Tahereh Javaheri; Frank Schnütgen; Andreas Ettinger; Zoltán Ivics; Jens Hansen; Patricia Ruiz; Harald von Melchner; Wolfgang Wurst; Thomas Floss
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Conditional gene-trap mutagenesis in zebrafish.

Authors:  Lisette A Maddison; Mingyu Li; Wenbiao Chen
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2014

Review 4.  The mouse genetics toolkit: revealing function and mechanism.

Authors:  Louise van der Weyden; Jacqueline K White; David J Adams; Darren W Logan
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 13.583

5.  Conditional Creation and Rescue of Nipbl-Deficiency in Mice Reveals Multiple Determinants of Risk for Congenital Heart Defects.

Authors:  Rosaysela Santos; Shimako Kawauchi; Russell E Jacobs; Martha E Lopez-Burks; Hojae Choi; Jamie Wikenheiser; Benedikt Hallgrimsson; Heather A Jamniczky; Scott E Fraser; Arthur D Lander; Anne L Calof
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 8.029

6.  Expression-independent gene trap vectors for random and targeted mutagenesis in embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Anestis Tsakiridis; Elena Tzouanacou; Afifah Rahman; Douglas Colby; Richard Axton; Ian Chambers; Valerie Wilson; Lesley Forrester; Joshua M Brickman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 7.  Contemporary approaches for modifying the mouse genome.

Authors:  David J Adams; Louise van der Weyden
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 3.107

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.