Literature DB >> 18369852

Removal of interfering substances in samples prepared for two-dimensional (2-D) electrophoresis.

Tom Berkelman1.   

Abstract

Biological samples may contain contaminants that interfere with analysis by two-dimensional (2-D) electrophoresis. Lysates or biological fluids are complex mixtures that contain a wide variety of nonprotein substances in addition to the proteins to be analyzed. These substances often interfere with the resolution of the electrophoretic separation or the visualization of the result. Macromolecules (e.g., polysaccharides and DNA) can interfere with electrophoretic separation by clogging gel pores. Small ionic molecules can impair isoelectric focusing (IEF) separation by rendering the sample too conductive. Other substances (e.g., phenolics and lipids) can bind to proteins, influencing their electrophoretic properties or solubility. In many cases, measures to remove interfering substances can result in significantly clearer 2-D patterns with more visible spots and better resolution. It should be borne in mind, however, that analysis of samples by 2-D electrophoresis is usually most successful and informative when performed with minimally processed samples, so it is important that any steps taken to remove interfering substance be appropriate to the sample and only performed when necessary. Procedures for the removal of interfering substances therefore represent a compromise between removing nonprotein contaminants, and minimizing interference with the integrity and relative abundances of the sample proteins. This chapter presents a number of illustrative examples of optimized sample preparation methods in which specific interfering substances are removed by a variety of different strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18369852     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-60327-064-9_5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  4 in total

Review 1.  Perspective: proteomic approach to detect biomarkers of human growth hormone.

Authors:  Juan Ding; Edward O List; Shigeru Okada; John J Kopchick
Journal:  Growth Horm IGF Res       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 2.372

2.  Immunoprecipitation of amyloid fibrils by the use of an antibody that recognizes a generic epitope common to amyloid fibrils.

Authors:  Erin R Greiner; Jeffery W Kelly; Fernando L Palhano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Development of high-performance two-dimensional gel electrophoresis for human hair shaft proteome.

Authors:  Sing Ying Wong; Onn Haji Hashim; Nobuhiro Hayashi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  The impact of growth hormone on proteomic profiles: a review of mouse and adult human studies.

Authors:  Silvana Duran-Ortiz; Alison L Brittain; John J Kopchick
Journal:  Clin Proteomics       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.988

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.