Literature DB >> 18367610

Biomechanics of the vibrissa motor plant in rat: rhythmic whisking consists of triphasic neuromuscular activity.

Dan N Hill1, Roberto Bermejo, H Philip Zeigler, David Kleinfeld.   

Abstract

The biomechanics of a motor plant constrain the behavioral strategies that an animal has available to extract information from its environment. We used the rat vibrissa system as a model for active sensing and determined the pattern of muscle activity that drives rhythmic exploratory whisking. Our approach made use of electromyography to measure the activation of all relevant muscles in both head-fixed and unrestrained rats and two-dimensional imaging to monitor the position of the vibrissae in head-fixed rats. Our essential finding is that the periodic motion of the vibrissae and mystacial pad during whisking results from three phases of muscle activity. First, the vibrissae are thrust forward as the rostral extrinsic muscle, musculus (m.) nasalis, contracts to pull the pad and initiate protraction. Second, late in protraction, the intrinsic muscles pivot the vibrissae farther forward. Third, retraction involves the cessation of m. nasalis and intrinsic muscle activity and the contraction of the caudal extrinsic muscles m. nasolabialis and m. maxillolabialis to pull the pad and the vibrissae backward. We developed a biomechanical model of the whisking motor plant that incorporates the measured muscular mechanics along with movement vectors observed from direct muscle stimulation in anesthetized rats. The results of simulations of the model quantify how the combination of extrinsic and intrinsic muscle activity leads to an enhanced range of vibrissa motion than would be available from the intrinsic muscles alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18367610      PMCID: PMC6670594          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5008-07.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  70 in total

Review 1.  Neuronal basis for object location in the vibrissa scanning sensorimotor system.

Authors:  David Kleinfeld; Martin Deschênes
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 2.  Biomimetic vibrissal sensing for robots.

Authors:  Martin J Pearson; Ben Mitchinson; J Charles Sullivan; Anthony G Pipe; Tony J Prescott
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Dorsorostral snout muscles in the rat subserve coordinated movement for whisking and sniffing.

Authors:  Sebastian Haidarliu; David Golomb; David Kleinfeld; Ehud Ahissar
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 2.064

4.  The Brainstem Oscillator for Whisking and the Case for Breathing as the Master Clock for Orofacial Motor Actions.

Authors:  David Kleinfeld; Jeffrey D Moore; Fan Wang; Martin Deschênes
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  2015-04-15

5.  Daily facial stimulation to improve recovery after facial nerve repair in rats.

Authors:  Robin W Lindsay; James T Heaton; Colin Edwards; Christopher Smitson; Kalpesh Vakharia; Tessa A Hadlock
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2010 May-Jun

6.  The Dilator Naris Muscle as a Reporter of Facial Nerve Regeneration in a Rat Model.

Authors:  Julie S Weinberg; Ingrid J Kleiss; Christopher J Knox; James T Heaton; Tessa A Hadlock
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.539

7.  Coordination of Orofacial Motor Actions into Exploratory Behavior by Rat.

Authors:  Anastasia Kurnikova; Jeffrey D Moore; Song-Mao Liao; Martin Deschênes; David Kleinfeld
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Primary motor cortex reports efferent control of vibrissa motion on multiple timescales.

Authors:  Daniel N Hill; John C Curtis; Jeffrey D Moore; David Kleinfeld
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Active Touch and Self-Motion Encoding by Merkel Cell-Associated Afferents.

Authors:  Kyle S Severson; Duo Xu; Margaret Van de Loo; Ling Bai; David D Ginty; Daniel H O'Connor
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Response properties of mouse trigeminal ganglion neurons.

Authors:  Ernest E Kwegyir-Afful; Sashi Marella; Daniel J Simons
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.111

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.