Literature DB >> 18989828

Response properties of mouse trigeminal ganglion neurons.

Ernest E Kwegyir-Afful1, Sashi Marella, Daniel J Simons.   

Abstract

We used controlled whisker deflections to examine the response properties of 208 primary afferent neurons in the trigeminal ganglion of adult mice. Proportions of rapidly adapting (RA, 47%) and slowly adapting (SA, 53%) neurons were equivalent, and most cells had low or no spontaneous activity. We quantified angular tuning and sensitivity to deflection amplitude and velocity. Both RA and SA units fired more frequently to larger deflections and faster deflections, but RA units were more sensitive to differences in velocity whereas SA units were more sensitive to deflection amplitudes. Almost all neurons were tuned for deflection angle, and the average response to the maximally effective direction was more than fourfold greater than the average response in the opposite direction; SA units were more tuned than RA units. Responses of primary afferent whisker-responsive neurons are qualitatively similar to those of the rat. However, average firing rates of both RA and SA neurons in the mouse are less sensitive to differences in deflection velocity, and RA units, unlike those in the rat, display amplitude sensitivity. Subtle observed differences between mice and rats may reflect greater mechanical compliance in mice of the whisker hairs and of the tissue in which they are embedded.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18989828      PMCID: PMC2597100          DOI: 10.1080/08990220802467612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res        ISSN: 0899-0220            Impact factor:   1.111


  41 in total

1.  Embodied information processing: vibrissa mechanics and texture features shape micromotions in actively sensing rats.

Authors:  Jason T Ritt; Mark L Andermann; Christopher I Moore
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Responses of rat trigeminal ganglion neurons to movements of vibrissae in different directions.

Authors:  S H Lichtenstein; G E Carvell; D J Simons
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.111

3.  Rats can learn a roughness discrimination using only their vibrissal system.

Authors:  E Guić-Robles; C Valdivieso; G Guajardo
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1989-01-01       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Microelectrode maps, myeloarchitecture, and cortical connections of three somatotopically organized representations of the body surface in the parietal cortex of squirrels.

Authors:  L A Krubitzer; M A Sesma; J H Kaas
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1986-08-22       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  Detection thresholds for stimuli in humans and monkeys: comparison with threshold events in mechanoreceptive afferent nerve fibers innervating the monkey hand.

Authors:  V B Mountcastle; R H LaMotte; G Carli
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Discriminative whisking in the head-fixed rat: optoelectronic monitoring during tactile detection and discrimination tasks.

Authors:  M A Harvey; R Bermejo; H P Zeigler
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.111

7.  Biometric analyses of vibrissal tactile discrimination in the rat.

Authors:  G E Carvell; D J Simons
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Functional architecture of the mystacial vibrissae.

Authors:  M Brecht; B Preilowski; M M Merzenich
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  The sensory contribution of a single vibrissa's cortical barrel.

Authors:  K A Hutson; R B Masterton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  The structural organization of layer IV in the somatosensory region (SI) of mouse cerebral cortex. The description of a cortical field composed of discrete cytoarchitectonic units.

Authors:  T A Woolsey; H Van der Loos
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1970-01-20       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  7 in total

1.  The cellular and molecular basis of direction selectivity of Aδ-LTMRs.

Authors:  Michael Rutlin; Cheng-Ying Ho; Victoria E Abraira; Colleen Cassidy; Ling Bai; C Jeffery Woodbury; David D Ginty
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Effect of whisker geometry on contact force produced by vibrissae moving at different velocities.

Authors:  George E Carvell; Daniel J Simons
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Whisker Vibrations and the Activity of Trigeminal Primary Afferents in Response to Airflow.

Authors:  Yan S W Yu; Nicholas E Bush; Mitra J Z Hartmann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Weaker feedforward inhibition accounts for less pronounced thalamocortical response transformation in mouse vs. rat barrels.

Authors:  E E Kwegyir-Afful; H T Kyriazi; D J Simons
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Demonstration of three-dimensional contact point determination and contour reconstruction during active whisking behavior of an awake rat.

Authors:  Lucie A Huet; Hannah M Emnett; Mitra J Z Hartmann
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 4.779

6.  Continuous, multidimensional coding of 3D complex tactile stimuli by primary sensory neurons of the vibrissal system.

Authors:  Nicholas E Bush; Sara A Solla; Mitra J Z Hartmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Representation of Stimulus Speed and Direction in Vibrissal-Sensitive Regions of the Trigeminal Nuclei: A Comparison of Single Unit and Population Responses.

Authors:  Aniket S Kaloti; Erik C Johnson; Chris S Bresee; Stephanie N Naufel; Matthew G Perich; Douglas L Jones; Mitra J Z Hartmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.