BACKGROUND: The genetic hallmark of mantle cell lymphoma is a t(11;14)(q13;q32). However, additional genomic alterations are likely involved in the pathogenesis of this lymphoma. DESIGN AND METHODS: To determine the incidence and clinical relevance of these aberrations, we analyzed 103 well-characterized samples of mantle cell lymphoma by fluorescence in situ hybridization for the most common recurrent additional genomic findings. RESULTS: Screening 16 different regions we detected additional genomic aberrations in 92% of the cases of mantle cell lymphoma. Common gains included 3q26, 8q24, 15q23, 7p15, and common losses 13q14, 11q22-q23, 9p21, 1p22, 17p13, 6q27, and 8p22. Deletions 8p22, 9p21, 13q14, and gain of 7p15 were associated with evidence of clonal heterogeneity. While there was no correlation of additional genomic aberrations and VH-mutation status, gain of 15q23 and deletion 6q27 were associated with lower disease stage (p=0.01 and p=0.04, respectively). Patients with deletion 13q14 had shorter overall survival times (p=0.01), and there was a strong trend towards inferior outcome in patients with deletion 9p21 (p=0.07). In multivariable analysis, loss of 13q14 and an International Prognosis Index score >/= 3 turned out to be significantly associated with inferior clinical outcome (p=0.002 and p<0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The comprehensive analysis of additional genomic aberrations in mantle cell lymphoma provided further evidence for the prognostic relevance of loss of 13q14, which warrants evaluation within prospective trials. Furthermore, our analysis gave novel insights into the pathogenesis of mantle cell lymphoma with regard to the detection of clonal heterogeneity, possibly indicating clonal evolution in this type of lymphoma.
BACKGROUND: The genetic hallmark of mantle cell lymphoma is a t(11;14)(q13;q32). However, additional genomic alterations are likely involved in the pathogenesis of this lymphoma. DESIGN AND METHODS: To determine the incidence and clinical relevance of these aberrations, we analyzed 103 well-characterized samples of mantle cell lymphoma by fluorescence in situ hybridization for the most common recurrent additional genomic findings. RESULTS: Screening 16 different regions we detected additional genomic aberrations in 92% of the cases of mantle cell lymphoma. Common gains included 3q26, 8q24, 15q23, 7p15, and common losses 13q14, 11q22-q23, 9p21, 1p22, 17p13, 6q27, and 8p22. Deletions 8p22, 9p21, 13q14, and gain of 7p15 were associated with evidence of clonal heterogeneity. While there was no correlation of additional genomic aberrations and VH-mutation status, gain of 15q23 and deletion 6q27 were associated with lower disease stage (p=0.01 and p=0.04, respectively). Patients with deletion 13q14 had shorter overall survival times (p=0.01), and there was a strong trend towards inferior outcome in patients with deletion 9p21 (p=0.07). In multivariable analysis, loss of 13q14 and an International Prognosis Index score >/= 3 turned out to be significantly associated with inferior clinical outcome (p=0.002 and p<0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The comprehensive analysis of additional genomic aberrations in mantle cell lymphoma provided further evidence for the prognostic relevance of loss of 13q14, which warrants evaluation within prospective trials. Furthermore, our analysis gave novel insights into the pathogenesis of mantle cell lymphoma with regard to the detection of clonal heterogeneity, possibly indicating clonal evolution in this type of lymphoma.
Authors: Ana Mozos; Cristina Royo; Elena Hartmann; Daphne De Jong; Cristina Baró; Alexandra Valera; Kai Fu; Dennis D Weisenburger; Jan Delabie; Shih-Sung Chuang; Elaine S Jaffe; Carmen Ruiz-Marcellan; Sandeep Dave; Lisa Rimsza; Rita Braziel; Randy D Gascoyne; Francisco Solé; Armando López-Guillermo; Dolors Colomer; Louis M Staudt; Andreas Rosenwald; German Ott; Pedro Jares; Elias Campo Journal: Haematologica Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Elisa Ramirez; Rajesh R Singh; Kranthi Kunkalla; Yadong Liu; Changju Qu; Christine Cain; Asha S Multani; Patrick A Lennon; Jared Jackacky; Michael Ho; Sity Dawud; Jun Gu; Su Yang; Peter C Hu; Francisco Vega Journal: Leuk Res Date: 2012-07-17 Impact factor: 3.156
Authors: Elena M Hartmann; Elias Campo; George Wright; Georg Lenz; Itziar Salaverria; Pedro Jares; Wenming Xiao; Rita M Braziel; Lisa M Rimsza; Wing-Chung Chan; Dennis D Weisenburger; Jan Delabie; Elaine S Jaffe; Randy D Gascoyne; Sandeep S Dave; Hans-Konrad Mueller-Hermelink; Louis M Staudt; German Ott; Sílvia Beà; Andreas Rosenwald Journal: Blood Date: 2010-04-26 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Yoonmi Seok; Juwon Kim; Jong Rak Choi; Yu Ri Kim; Seo-Jin Park; Sue Jung Kim; Jaewoo Song; Kyung-A Lee Journal: Ann Lab Med Date: 2011-12-20 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Magdalena Julia Dabrowska; Karen Dybkaer; Hans Erik Johnsen; Bruce Wang; Matthias Wabl; Finn Skou Pedersen Journal: J Virol Date: 2009-05-27 Impact factor: 5.103