Literature DB >> 18366970

Watchful waiting for small renal masses.

Kamal Mattar1, Michael A S Jewett.   

Abstract

Small renal masses (SRMs; < 4 cm in diameter) account for most renal tumors treated today. Incidental early detection of SRMs by abdominal imaging results in favorable grade and stage migration to renal cell carcinoma, and also increases detection of benign renal tumors. As a result, most SRMs manifest indolent biological behavior with excellent prognosis. Despite the increased use of minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery, nephron-sparing techniques, and percutaneous ablation therapy, selected patients are managed by initial active surveillance, reserving therapy for progression. Older patients and those with competing risks due to medical comorbidities are excellent candidates for active surveillance; their risk of early progression due to growth or metastases appears to be low. Active surveillance should not be recommended for younger, healthier patients until prognostic factors are better defined. Needle core use for improved histopathologic characterization of SRMs should be considered before recommending treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18366970     DOI: 10.1007/s11934-008-0006-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol Rep        ISSN: 1527-2737            Impact factor:   3.092


  40 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of cryoablation, radiofrequency ablation and high-intensity focused ultrasound for treating small renal tumours.

Authors:  Kyle J Weld; Jaime Landman
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Proposal for revision of the TNM classification system for renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; François Guillè; Luigi Schips; Alexander de la Taille; Tommaso Prayer Galetti; Jacques Tostain; Luca Cindolo; Giacomo Novara; Richard Zigeuner; Emiliano Bratti; Guorong Li; Vincenzo Altieri; Claude C Abbou; Luisa Zanolla; Walter Artibani; Jean-Jacques Patard
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: a 9-year experience.

Authors:  M D Dunn; A J Portis; A L Shalhav; A M Elbahnasy; C Heidorn; E M McDougall; R V Clayman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Renal cancer in families with hereditary renal cancer: prospective analysis of a tumor size threshold for renal parenchymal sparing surgery.

Authors:  M M Walther; P L Choyke; G Glenn; J C Lyne; W Rayford; D Venzon; W M Linehan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Rising incidence of small renal masses: a need to reassess treatment effect.

Authors:  John M Hollingsworth; David C Miller; Stephanie Daignault; Brent K Hollenbeck
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Pathological features of renal neoplasms classified by size and symptomatology.

Authors:  Bruce Schlomer; Robert S Figenshau; Yan Yan; Ramakrishna Venkatesh; Sam B Bhayani
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: 3-year followup.

Authors:  Alireza Moinzadeh; Inderbir S Gill; Antonio Finelli; Jihad Kaouk; Mihir Desai
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Reassessment of the 1997 TNM classification system for renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  James M Elmore; Keith T Kadesky; Kenneth S Koeneman; Arthur I Sagalowsky
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Prognostic significance of tumour size in patients after tumour nephrectomy for localised renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Thomas Steiner; Ralf Knels; Joerg Schubert
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 10.  Histopathology of surgically managed renal tumors: analysis of a contemporary series.

Authors:  David A Duchene; Yair Lotan; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Arthur I Sagalowsky; Kenneth S Koeneman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  4 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of imaging-guided needle biopsy of renal masses. Retrospective analysis on 150 cases.

Authors:  Andrea Veltri; Irene Garetto; Irene Tosetti; Marco Busso; Alessandro Volpe; Donatella Pacchioni; Enrico Bollito; Mauro Papotti
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Percutaneous ablation in the kidney.

Authors:  Aradhana M Venkatesan; Bradford J Wood; Debra A Gervais
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Growth pattern of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in patients with delayed surgical intervention.

Authors:  Xue-Song Li; Lin Yao; Kan Gong; Wei Yu; Qun He; Li-Qun Zhou; Zhi-Song He
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Contemporary clinical epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma: insight from a population based case-control study.

Authors:  David C Miller; Julie Ruterbusch; Joanne S Colt; Faith G Davis; W Marston Linehan; Wong-Ho Chow; Kendra Schwartz
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 7.450

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.