Literature DB >> 18366778

Stability analysis of mixtures of mutagenetic trees.

Jasmina Bogojeska1, Thomas Lengauer, Jörg Rahnenführer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mixture models of mutagenetic trees are evolutionary models that capture several pathways of ordered accumulation of genetic events observed in different subsets of patients. They were used to model HIV progression by accumulation of resistance mutations in the viral genome under drug pressure and cancer progression by accumulation of chromosomal aberrations in tumor cells. From the mixture models a genetic progression score (GPS) can be derived that estimates the genetic status of single patients according to the corresponding progression along the tree models. GPS values were shown to have predictive power for estimating drug resistance in HIV or the survival time in cancer. Still, the reliability of the exact values of such complex markers derived from graphical models can be questioned.
RESULTS: In a simulation study, we analyzed various aspects of the stability of estimated mutagenetic trees mixture models. It turned out that the induced probabilistic distributions and the tree topologies are recovered with high precision by an EM-like learning algorithm. However, only for models with just one major model component, also GPS values of single patients can be reliably estimated.
CONCLUSION: It is encouraging that the estimation process of mutagenetic trees mixture models can be performed with high confidence regarding induced probability distributions and the general shape of the tree topologies. For a model with only one major disease progression process, even genetic progression scores for single patients can be reliably estimated. However, for models with more than one relevant component, alternative measures should be introduced for estimating the stage of disease progression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18366778      PMCID: PMC2335279          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1471-2105            Impact factor:   3.169


  8 in total

1.  Inferring tree models for oncogenesis from comparative genome hybridization data.

Authors:  R Desper; F Jiang; O P Kallioniemi; H Moch; C H Papadimitriou; A A Schäffer
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  Ordered appearance of zidovudine resistance mutations during treatment of 18 human immunodeficiency virus-positive subjects.

Authors:  C A Boucher; E O'Sullivan; J W Mulder; C Ramautarsing; P Kellam; G Darby; J M Lange; J Goudsmit; B A Larder
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.226

3.  Learning multiple evolutionary pathways from cross-sectional data.

Authors:  Niko Beerenwinkel; Jörg Rahnenführer; Martin Däumer; Daniel Hoffmann; Rolf Kaiser; Joachim Selbig; Thomas Lengauer
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.479

4.  Model selection for mixtures of mutagenetic trees.

Authors:  Junming Yin; Niko Beerenwinkel; Jörg Rahnenführer; Thomas Lengauer
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2006-06-23

5.  HIV with reduced sensitivity to zidovudine (AZT) isolated during prolonged therapy.

Authors:  B A Larder; G Darby; D D Richman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-03-31       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Multiple mutations in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase confer high-level resistance to zidovudine (AZT).

Authors:  B A Larder; S D Kemp
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-12-01       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Estimating cancer survival and clinical outcome based on genetic tumor progression scores.

Authors:  Jörg Rahnenführer; Niko Beerenwinkel; Wolfgang A Schulz; Christian Hartmann; Andreas von Deimling; Bernd Wullich; Thomas Lengauer
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-02-10       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Human immunodeficiency virus reverse transcriptase and protease sequence database.

Authors:  Soo-Yon Rhee; Matthew J Gonzales; Rami Kantor; Bradley J Betts; Jaideep Ravela; Robert W Shafer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

  8 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of tumour phylogenetics: principles and practice.

Authors:  Russell Schwartz; Alejandro A Schäffer
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Identifying restrictions in the order of accumulation of mutations during tumor progression: effects of passengers, evolutionary models, and sampling.

Authors:  Ramon Diaz-Uriarte
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Rtreemix: an R package for estimating evolutionary pathways and genetic progression scores.

Authors:  Jasmina Bogojeska; Adrian Alexa; André Altmann; Thomas Lengauer; Jörg Rahnenführer
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Algorithms to model single gene, single chromosome, and whole genome copy number changes jointly in tumor phylogenetics.

Authors:  Salim Akhter Chowdhury; Stanley E Shackney; Kerstin Heselmeyer-Haddad; Thomas Ried; Alejandro A Schäffer; Russell Schwartz
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Variable selection for disease progression models: methods for oncogenetic trees and application to cancer and HIV.

Authors:  Katrin Hainke; Sebastian Szugat; Roland Fried; Jörg Rahnenführer
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.