Literature DB >> 10223663

Inferring tree models for oncogenesis from comparative genome hybridization data.

R Desper1, F Jiang, O P Kallioniemi, H Moch, C H Papadimitriou, A A Schäffer.   

Abstract

Comparative genome hybridization (CGH) is a laboratory method to measure gains and losses of chromosomal regions in tumor cells. It is believed that DNA gains and losses in tumor cells do not occur entirely at random, but partly through some flow of causality. Models that relate tumor progression to the occurrence of DNA gains and losses could be very useful in hunting cancer genes and in cancer diagnosis. We lay some mathematical foundations for inferring a model of tumor progression from a CGH data set. We consider a class of tree models that are more general than a path model that has been developed for colorectal cancer. We derive a tree model inference algorithm based on the idea of a maximum-weight branching in a graph, and we show that under plausible assumptions our algorithm infers the correct tree. We have implemented our methods in software, and we illustrate with a CGH data set for renal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10223663     DOI: 10.1089/cmb.1999.6.37

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Biol        ISSN: 1066-5277            Impact factor:   1.479


  67 in total

1.  Early and late genetic changes in clear cell renal carcinoma.

Authors:  Holger Moch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Accurate reconstruction of the temporal order of mutations in neoplastic progression.

Authors:  Kathleen Sprouffske; John W Pepper; Carlo C Maley
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2011-04-13

3.  Algorithmic methods to infer the evolutionary trajectories in cancer progression.

Authors:  Giulio Caravagna; Alex Graudenzi; Daniele Ramazzotti; Rebeca Sanz-Pamplona; Luca De Sano; Giancarlo Mauri; Victor Moreno; Marco Antoniotti; Bud Mishra
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  The evolution of tumour phylogenetics: principles and practice.

Authors:  Russell Schwartz; Alejandro A Schäffer
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Phylogenetic analysis of multiple FISH markers in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma suggests that a diverse distribution of copy number changes is associated with poor prognosis.

Authors:  Darawalee Wangsa; Salim Akhter Chowdhury; Michael Ryott; E Michael Gertz; Göran Elmberger; Gert Auer; Elisabeth Åvall Lundqvist; Stefan Küffer; Philipp Ströbel; Alejandro A Schäffer; Russell Schwartz; Eva Munck-Wikland; Thomas Ried; Kerstin Heselmeyer-Haddad
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  The peaks and geometry of fitness landscapes.

Authors:  Kristina Crona; Devin Greene; Miriam Barlow
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  Robust unmixing of tumor states in array comparative genomic hybridization data.

Authors:  David Tolliver; Charalampos Tsourakakis; Ayshwarya Subramanian; Stanley Shackney; Russell Schwartz
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  A differentiation-based phylogeny of cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Markus Riester; Camille Stephan-Otto Attolini; Robert J Downey; Samuel Singer; Franziska Michor
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Classification and feature selection algorithms for multi-class CGH data.

Authors:  Jun Liu; Sanjay Ranka; Tamer Kahveci
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Applying unmixing to gene expression data for tumor phylogeny inference.

Authors:  Russell Schwartz; Stanley E Shackney
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.