| Literature DB >> 18366704 |
Erica Chimara1, Lucilaine Ferrazoli, Suely Yoko Misuka Ueky, Maria Conceição Martins, Alan Mitchel Durham, Robert D Arbeit, Sylvia Cardoso Leão.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Identification of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) based on phenotypic tests is time-consuming, labor-intensive, expensive and often provides erroneous or inconclusive results. In the molecular method referred to as PRA-hsp65, a fragment of the hsp65 gene is amplified by PCR and then analyzed by restriction digest; this rapid approach offers the promise of accurate, cost-effective species identification. The aim of this study was to determine whether species identification of NTM using PRA-hsp65 is sufficiently reliable to serve as the routine methodology in a reference laboratory.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18366704 PMCID: PMC2323382 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-8-48
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Species identification of 321 isolates which had concordant results by both phenotypic and PRA-hsp65 methods.
| 107 (33.5) | ||
| 24 (7.5) | ||
| 1 (0.3) | ||
| 13 (4.1) | ||
| 1 (0.3) | ||
| 95 (29.7) | ||
| 2 (0.6) | ||
| 19 (6.0) | ||
| 2 (0.6) | ||
| 1 (0.3) | ||
| 3 (0.9) | ||
| 3 (0.9) | ||
| 21 (6.6) | ||
| 1 (0.3) | ||
| 2 (0.6) | ||
| 5 (1.6) | ||
| 14 (4.4) | ||
| 2 (0.6) | ||
| 2 (0.6) | ||
| 1 (0.3) | ||
| 1 (0.3) | ||
| 1 (0.3) |
a Number of isolates.
b PRA-hsp65 designation; see text for details.
Results for 96 NTM isolates for which phenotypic methods gave incorrect species identification as determined by hsp65 sequencing.
| 1 | SGN | |
| 1 | ||
| 2 | SGN | |
| 1 | SGS | |
| 2 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 2 | ||
| 10 | SGN | |
| 1 | RGN | |
| 1 | SGP | |
| 1 | SGS | |
| 1 | ||
| 1 | SGN | |
| 2 | SGN | |
| 1 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 1 | RGS | |
| 2 | ||
| 1 | RGN | |
| 1 | SGN | |
| 1 | SGN | |
| 1 | RGP | |
| 1 | SGN | |
| 12 | SGS | |
| 1 | RGS | |
| 1 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 7 | SGN | |
| 1 | ||
| 2 | RGP | |
| 1 | SGN | |
| 2 | SGP | |
| 1 | SGS | |
| 2 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 2 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 3 | SGN | |
| 1 | SGS | |
| 1 | ||
| 1 | SGN | |
| 4 | ||
| 1 | RGS | |
| 1 | ||
| 2 | SGN | |
| 2 | ||
| 1 | SGN | |
| 1 | SGS | |
| 1 | SGN |
a Species identification was determined by hsp65 sequencing for 113 isolates that had discordant results by PRA-hsp65 and phenotypic studies. For 17 isolates sequencing confirmed the species identification obtained by phenotypic methods.
b Number of isolates for which the phenotypic identification shown was incorrect.
c Total number of isolates of that species sequenced. SGS: slowly growing scotochromogen; SGN: slowly growing nonchromogen; SGP: slowly growing photochromogen; RGS: rapidly growing scotochromogen; RGN: rapidly growing nonchromogen; RGP: rapidly growing photochromogen.
Results for 12 NTM isolates for which PRA-hsp65 gave incorrect species identification as determined by hsp65 sequencing.
| 1 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 2 | ||
| 1 |
a Species identification was determined by hsp65 sequencing for 113 isolates that had discordant results by PRA-hsp65 and phenotypic studies. For 71 isolates sequencing confirmed the species identification obtained by PRA-hsp65. For an additional 30 isolates, the PRA-hsp65 patterns obtained were previously unreported (see Table 4).
b N, number of isolates for which the PRA-hsp65 identification shown was incorrect.
c Total number of isolates of that species sequenced.
BstEII and HaeIII fragment lengths (base pairs) for 30 isolates with new patterns by PRA-hsp65.
| NP10 | 1 | 320-115 | 140-90-60 | |
| NP6 | 1 | 320-115 | 150-95-80 | |
| NP12 | 1 | 235-120-85 | 140-120-100-55 | |
| NP19 | 1 | 235-120-100 | 145-140-100-55 | |
| NP3 | 1 | 320-130 | 130-60 | |
| NP13 | 1 | 235-120-85 | 130-90 | |
| NP22 | 1 | 235-130-85 | 160-90-60 | |
| NP5 | 1 | 240-130-85 | 145-100-50 | |
| NP4 | 1 | 235-120-85 | 145-80-60 | |
a Species identification based on sequencing of hsp65 gene. Bold indicates sequences submitted to GenBank and patterns included in the updated PRA-hsp65 algorithm (see Figures 1, 2 and 3). GenBank accession numbers: NP1, EF601222; NP11, EF601223; NP14, AY365190 [23]; NP17, DQ168662 [18].
All isolates with new PRA-hsp65 profiles were cultured from sputum, with the following exceptions: NP1: urine (2), feces, liver biopsy and unknown (one each); NP17: unknown (2).
Phenotypic characteristics of isolates demonstrating previously unreported PRA-hsp65 patterns.
| NP17 | 3 | 3 | 0 | N | 2–3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0–1 | 0–2 | nd | 0 | 0–1 | nd | 3 | 2–3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0–1 | 3 | |
| NP10 | 3 | 3 | 0 | N | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| NP6 | 3 | 3 | 2 | N | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | nd | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |
| NP12 | 3 | 3 | 0 | S | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
| NP19 | 3 | 3 | 0 | N | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | |
| NP1 | 2–3 | 3 | 0 | S | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1–3 | 3 | 0–3 | 0–3 | 0–1 | 0–1 | 1–3 | |
| NP3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | S | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| NP13 | 1 | 2 | 0 | P | 3 | 1 | 0 | nd | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |
| NP22 | 3 | 3 | 3 | S | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | nd | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | nd | |
| NP5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | N | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| NP4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | N | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | nd | 1 | 1 | nd | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| NP14 | 1 | 2 | 0 | S | 1–2 | 0 | 0 | 1–2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1–2 | 1–2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1–2 | |
| NP11 | 2 | 3 | 0 | N/S | 2–3 | 0–3 | 1, 2 | 1 | 0 | 0–1 | 0 | 0 | 0–1 | 3 | 3 | 1, 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0, 1 | 3 |
Phenotypes: 24°C, 36°C, 45°C: growth at temperature shown; pg: pigmentation (N, nonchromogen; P, photochromogen; S, scotochromogen); TCH: growth on thiophene-2-carboxylic acid hydrazide; nit: nitrate reduction; Tween: hydrolysis of Tween 80; NaCl: growth on 5% NaCl; Aryl 3. Aryl 15: arylsulfatase activity after 3 and 15 days of growth, respectively; ag: growth on nutrient agar; pic: growth on picric acid; β-gal: β-galactosidase activity; LJ: growth on Löwenstein-Jensen media; HA: growth on hydroxylamine 500 μg/ml; PNB: growth on p-nitrobenzoic acid; INH: isoniazid; RF: rifampicin; EMB: ethambutol; CIP: ciprofloxacin; OFL: ofloxacin. Responses are graded 0 (negative, no growth, no activity expressed) to 3 (positive, heavy growth, strong activity expressed); nd, not done. For patterns with multiple isolates, the result shown represents the most common phenotype(s) or the range of phenotypes observed.
Summary of concordance among species identification results obtained by PRA-hsp65, phenotypic evaluation and sequence analysis of the hsp65 gene.
| Not donea | 321 | 321 | -- | -- | 321 | -- | -- |
| Done | 113 | 71 | 30 | 12 | 17 | 63 | 33 |
| Total | 434 | 392 (90.3%) | 30 (6.9%) | 12 (2.8%) | 338 (77.9%) | 63 (14.5%) | 33 (7.6%) |
a Isolates for which species identification by PRA-hsp65 and phenotypic/biochemical evaluation were concordant were not sequenced. Based on prior reports by the authors and others, sequencing hsp65 in such isolates almost invariably confirms the species identification of the other methods.
Figure 1Algorithm of PRA-. Columns 1 and 2: calculated BstEII and HaeIII fragment sizes in base pairs. Column 3: species names according to [32]. Column 4: PRA-hsp65 pattern type. Column 5: RGN: rapidly growing non-pigmented, RGS: rapidly growing scotochromogen, RGP: rapidly growing photochromogen, SGN: slowly growing non-pigmented, SGS: slowly growing scotochromogen, SGP: slowly growing photochromogen. Column 6: strain(s) used for hsp65 sequencing or reference of the publication describing this pattern.
Figure 2Algorithm of PRA-hsp65 patterns based on analysis of the 441 bp fragment of the hsp65 gene. BstEII patterns: 235 bp/210 bp. Columns 1 and 2: calculated BstEII and HaeIII fragment sizes in base pairs. Column 3: species names according to [32]. Column 4: PRA-hsp65 pattern type. Column 5: RGN: rapidly growing non-pigmented, RGS: rapidly growing scotochromogen, RGP: rapidly growing photochromogen, SGN: slowly growing non-pigmented, SGS: slowly growing scotochromogen, SGP: slowly growing photochromogen. Column 6: strain(s) used for hsp65 sequencing or reference of the publication describing this pattern.
Figure 3Algorithm of PRA-. Columns 1 and 2: calculated BstEII and HaeIII fragment sizes in base pairs. Column 3: species names according to [32]. Column 4: PRA-hsp65 pattern type. Column 5: RGN: rapidly growing non-pigmented, RGS: rapidly growing scotochromogen, RGP: rapidly growing photochromogen, SGN: slowly growing non-pigmented, SGS: slowly growing scotochromogen, SGP: slowly growing photochromogen. Column 6: strain(s) used for hsp65 sequencing or reference of the publication describing this pattern.