Literature DB >> 18366316

Imaging-assisted endoscopic surgery: Cleveland Clinic experience.

Osamu Ukimura1, Inderbir S Gill.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Our initial experience in using computer-aided image assistance in minimally invasive urology was reported.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The system consisted of a computer and a localizer allowing spatial localization of the position of the various surgical instruments, using a magnetic sensor as well as an optical sensor. Available imaging modality included real-time ultrasound as well as preoperative computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
RESULTS: We first clinically applied the fusion system of real-time US with preoperative CT or MRI for percutanous radiofrequency/cryoablation for renal tumor. We also clinically applied an augmented reality visualization system that helps the laparoscopic surgeon to understand three-dimensional (3D) anatomies beyond the surgical view. Augmented reality was feasible and useful to facilitate the surgeon's direct interpretation of 3D anatomies of cancer or vital anatomies beyond the surgical view, using preoperative CT data during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and intraoperative transrectal US during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. To our knowledge, we report the first clinical use of augmented reality technology in urology.
CONCLUSIONS: Imaging assistance beyond the endoscopic surgical view could increase the precision for and confidence of the surgeon, providing preoperative oncological data and understanding of the surrounding vital anatomies. Novel computer-based emerging techniques with 3D imaging technologies potentially indicate the ideal dissection plane to achieve better oncological outcomes as well as to maximize functional preservation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18366316     DOI: 10.1089/end.2007.9823

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  23 in total

1.  Augmented reality navigation system for laparoscopic splenectomy in children based on preoperative CT image using optical tracking device.

Authors:  Satoshi Ieiri; Munenori Uemura; Kouzou Konishi; Ryota Souzaki; Yoshihiro Nagao; Norifumi Tsutsumi; Tomohiko Akahoshi; Kenoki Ohuchida; Takeshi Ohdaira; Morimasa Tomikawa; Kazuo Tanoue; Makoto Hashizume; Tomoaki Taguchi
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  [Intraoperative augmented reality visualization. Current state of development and initial experiences with the CamC].

Authors:  S Weidert; L Wang; A von der Heide; N Navab; E Euler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  New trends in minimally invasive urological surgery: what is beyond the robot?

Authors:  Salvatore Micali; Giovannalberto Pini; Dogu Teber; Maria Chiara Sighinolfi; Stefano De Stefani; Giampaolo Bianchi; Jens Rassweiler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Image-guided robotic interventions for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ashwin N Sridhar; Archie Hughes-Hallett; Erik K Mayer; Philip J Pratt; Philip J Edwards; Guang-Zhong Yang; Ara W Darzi; Justin A Vale
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  3D-holoscopic imaging: a new dimension to enhance imaging in minimally invasive therapy in urologic oncology.

Authors:  Jonathan K Makanjuola; Amar Aggoun; Mohammad Swash; Philippe C R Grange; Benjamin Challacombe; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Augmented reality in a tumor resection model.

Authors:  Pauline Chauvet; Toby Collins; Clement Debize; Lorraine Novais-Gameiro; Bruno Pereira; Adrien Bartoli; Michel Canis; Nicolas Bourdel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Imaging guidance in minimally invasive prostatectomy.

Authors:  Angela D Gupta; Misop Han
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 8.  Role of MRI in planning radical prostatectomy: what is the added value?

Authors:  Jose Marenco; Clement Orczyk; Tom Collins; Caroline Moore; Mark Emberton
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 9.  Urologic robots and future directions.

Authors:  Pierre Mozer; Jocelyne Troccaz; Dan Stoianovici
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.309

10.  Mobile, real-time, and point-of-care augmented reality is robust, accurate, and feasible: a prospective pilot study.

Authors:  Hannes Götz Kenngott; Anas Amin Preukschas; Martin Wagner; Felix Nickel; Michael Müller; Nadine Bellemann; Christian Stock; Markus Fangerau; Boris Radeleff; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Hans-Peter Meinzer; Lena Maier-Hein; Beat Peter Müller-Stich
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.