F Fischbach1, M Müller, H Bruhn. 1. Department of Radiology, Otto von Guericke University, Medical School, Magdeburg, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3.0 Tesla (T) is rapidly gaining clinical acceptance. Whether doubling of the field strength of 1.5T and the subsequent increase in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) leads to a significant improvement of image quality is not automatically given. PURPOSE: To evaluate the depiction of fine anatomic detail in the posterior fossa, focusing on brain nerves, on T2-weighted imaging, and to define the potential advantage of imaging at 3.0T versus 1.5T. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In total, 10 brainstem nerve pairs of 12 volunteers were identified on T2-weighted MR images of 2- and 5-mm section thickness acquired at 1.5T and 3.0T. The MR images were compared for each subject at both field strengths by three independent readers who rated image quality according to depiction of anatomic detail and contrast by using a rating scale. RESULTS: In general, MR images at 3.0T were considered more conspicuous and less noisy than images at 1.5T. The SNR value measured was almost doubled. With respect to structural identification and contrast according to the rating scale, observer scores were significantly improved both for standard imaging with 5-mm sections and high-resolution imaging with 2-mm sections at 3.0T. Direct comparison revealed a significant increase for evaluated image quality criteria and the number of nerves detected. CONCLUSION: The comparison revealed a clear advantage in favor of T2-weighted MRI at 3.0T vs. 1.5T in depicting the roots and course of brain nerves in the posterior fossa.
BACKGROUND: High-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3.0 Tesla (T) is rapidly gaining clinical acceptance. Whether doubling of the field strength of 1.5T and the subsequent increase in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) leads to a significant improvement of image quality is not automatically given. PURPOSE: To evaluate the depiction of fine anatomic detail in the posterior fossa, focusing on brain nerves, on T2-weighted imaging, and to define the potential advantage of imaging at 3.0T versus 1.5T. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In total, 10 brainstem nerve pairs of 12 volunteers were identified on T2-weighted MR images of 2- and 5-mm section thickness acquired at 1.5T and 3.0T. The MR images were compared for each subject at both field strengths by three independent readers who rated image quality according to depiction of anatomic detail and contrast by using a rating scale. RESULTS: In general, MR images at 3.0T were considered more conspicuous and less noisy than images at 1.5T. The SNR value measured was almost doubled. With respect to structural identification and contrast according to the rating scale, observer scores were significantly improved both for standard imaging with 5-mm sections and high-resolution imaging with 2-mm sections at 3.0T. Direct comparison revealed a significant increase for evaluated image quality criteria and the number of nerves detected. CONCLUSION: The comparison revealed a clear advantage in favor of T2-weighted MRI at 3.0T vs. 1.5T in depicting the roots and course of brain nerves in the posterior fossa.
Authors: A E Grams; O Kraff; J Kalkmann; S Orzada; S Maderwald; M E Ladd; M Forsting; E R Gizewski Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2012-09-27 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: Barbara Kirnbauer; Norbert Jakse; Petra Rugani; Michael Schwaiger; Marton Magyar Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2018-02-13 Impact factor: 2.419
Authors: M Cassetta; F Barchetti; N Pranno; G Barchetti; C Fioravanti; A Stagnitti; A Rubini; E Fioravanti; E Saccoliti; D Elia; M Rossignuolo; Claudio Russo; V Cantisani; V D'Andrea Journal: G Chir Date: 2014 Jan-Feb
Authors: John N Oshinski; Jana G Delfino; Puneet Sharma; Ahmed M Gharib; Roderic I Pettigrew Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2010-10-07 Impact factor: 5.364