Literature DB >> 18363042

One-minute dynamic cerebral autoregulation in severe head injury patients and its comparison with static autoregulation. A transcranial Doppler study.

Corina Puppo1, Lucía López, Elia Caragna, Alberto Biestro.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare dynamic and static responses of cerebral blood flow to sudden or slow changes in arterial pressure in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients.
DESIGN: Prospective study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 12 severe TBI patients, age 16-63 years, and median GCS 6. We determined the dynamic cerebral autoregulation: response of cerebral blood flow velocity to a step blood pressure drop, and the static cerebral autoregulation: change in cerebral blood flow velocity after a slow hypertensive challenge.
RESULTS: During the dynamic response, the median drop in arterial pressure was 21 mm Hg. Dynamic response was graded between 9 (best) and 0 (worst). The median value was 5; four patients showed high values, (8-9), five patients showed intermediate values (4-6). In three patients (value = 0), the CBFV drop was greater than the cerebral perfusion pressure drop, and maintained through 60 s. The static cerebral autoregulation was preserved in 6/11 patients. The comparison between the two showed four different combinations. The five patients with impaired static cerebral autoregulation showed unfavorable outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: A sharp dynamic vasodilator response could not be sustained, and a slow or absent reaction to a sudden hypotensive challenge could show an acceptable cerebral autoregulation in the steady state. We found that patients with impaired static cerebral autoregulation had a poor outcome, whereas those with preserved static cerebral autoregulation experience favorable outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18363042     DOI: 10.1007/s12028-008-9069-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurocrit Care        ISSN: 1541-6933            Impact factor:   3.210


  21 in total

1.  Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular autoregulation: a validation study.

Authors:  E W Lang; H M Mehdorn; N W C Dorsch; M Czosnyka
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Cerebral vasomotor reactivity testing in head injury: the link between pressure and flow.

Authors:  E W Lang; J Lagopoulos; J Griffith; K Yip; A Yam; Y Mudaliar; H M Mehdorn; N W C Dorsch
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 3.  Assessment of cerebral pressure autoregulation in humans--a review of measurement methods.

Authors:  R B Panerai
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.833

4.  Dynamic autoregulatory response after severe head injury.

Authors:  Roman Hlatky; Yu Furuya; Alex B Valadka; Jorge Gonzalez; Ari Chacko; Yasu Mizutani; Charles F Contant; Claudia S Robertson
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 5.  Transcranial Doppler: clinical and experimental uses.

Authors:  D W Newell; R Aaslid
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Brain Metab Rev       Date:  1992

6.  Cerebral arterial diameters during changes in blood pressure and carbon dioxide during craniotomy.

Authors:  C A Giller; G Bowman; H Dyer; L Mootz; W Krippner
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Assessment of cerebral autoregulation dynamics from simultaneous arterial and venous transcranial Doppler recordings in humans.

Authors:  R Aaslid; D W Newell; R Stooss; W Sorteberg; K F Lindegaard
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Aminergic histofluorescence and contractile responses to transmural electrical field stimulation and norepinephrine of human middle cerebral arteries obtained promptly after death.

Authors:  J W Duckworth; G C Wellman; C L Walters; J A Bevan
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 17.367

9.  Comparison of static and dynamic cerebral autoregulation measurements.

Authors:  F P Tiecks; A M Lam; R Aaslid; D W Newell
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Comparison of flow and velocity during dynamic autoregulation testing in humans.

Authors:  D W Newell; R Aaslid; A Lam; T S Mayberg; H R Winn
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  5 in total

1.  Diagnostic and prognostic performance of Mxa and transfer function analysis-based dynamic cerebral autoregulation metrics.

Authors:  Markus Harboe Olsen; Christian Riberholt; Ronni R Plovsing; Ronan Mg Berg; Kirsten Møller
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 6.960

Review 2.  Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography: From methodology to major clinical applications.

Authors:  Antonello D'Andrea; Marianna Conte; Massimo Cavallaro; Raffaella Scarafile; Lucia Riegler; Rosangela Cocchia; Enrica Pezzullo; Andreina Carbone; Francesco Natale; Giuseppe Santoro; Pio Caso; Maria Giovanna Russo; Eduardo Bossone; Raffaele Calabrò
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2016-07-26

Review 3.  Transcranial Doppler ultrasound: a review of the physical principles and major applications in critical care.

Authors:  Jawad Naqvi; Kok Hooi Yap; Gulraiz Ahmad; Jonathan Ghosh
Journal:  Int J Vasc Med       Date:  2013-12-12

Review 4.  Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound: Physical Principles and Principal Applications in Neurocritical Care Unit.

Authors:  Antonello D'Andrea; Marianna Conte; Raffaella Scarafile; Lucia Riegler; Rosangela Cocchia; Enrica Pezzullo; Massimo Cavallaro; Andreina Carbone; Francesco Natale; Maria Giovanna Russo; Giovanni Gregorio; Raffaele Calabrò
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Echogr       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

Review 5.  Multimodality monitoring consensus statement: monitoring in emerging economies.

Authors:  Anthony Figaji; Corina Puppo
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.210

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.