Literature DB >> 7762016

Comparison of static and dynamic cerebral autoregulation measurements.

F P Tiecks1, A M Lam, R Aaslid, D W Newell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Cerebral autoregulation can be evaluated by measuring relative blood flow changes in response to a steady-state change in the blood pressure (static method) or during the response to a rapid change in blood pressure (dynamic method). The purpose of this study was to compare the results of the two methods in humans with both intact and impaired autoregulatory capacity.
METHODS: Using intraoperative transcranial Doppler sonography recordings from both middle cerebral arteries, we determined static and dynamic autoregulatory responses in 10 normal subjects undergoing elective surgical procedures. The changes in cerebrovascular resistance were estimated from the changes in cerebral blood flow velocity and arterial blood pressure in response to manipulations of blood pressure. Static autoregulation was determined by analyzing the response to a phenylephrine-induced rise in blood pressure, whereas rapid deflation of a blood pressure cuff around one thigh served as a stimulus for testing dynamic autoregulation. Both measurements were performed in patients with intact autoregulation during propofol anesthesia and again in the same patients after autoregulation had been impaired by administration of high-dose isoflurane.
RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in autoregulatory capacity after the administration of high-dose isoflurane, which could be demonstrated using static (P < .0001) and dynamic (P < .0001) methods. The correlation between static or steady-state and dynamic autoregulation measurements was highly significant (r = .93, P < .0001).
CONCLUSIONS: These data show that in normal human subjects measurement of dynamic autoregulation yields similar results as static testing of intact and pharmacologically impaired autoregulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7762016     DOI: 10.1161/01.str.26.6.1014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  202 in total

1.  Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular autoregulation: a validation study.

Authors:  E W Lang; H M Mehdorn; N W C Dorsch; M Czosnyka
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Myogenic responses occur on a beat-to-beat basis in the resting human limb.

Authors:  Seth T Fairfax; Jaume Padilla; Lauro C Vianna; Seth W Holwerda; Michael J Davis; Paul J Fadel
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 4.733

3.  Estimating normal and pathological dynamic responses in cerebral blood flow velocity to step changes in end-tidal pCO2.

Authors:  D M Simpson; R B Panerai; D H Evans; J Garnham; A R Naylor; P R Bell
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Measurement of cerebral blood flow responses to the thigh cuff maneuver: a comparison of TCD with a novel MRI method.

Authors:  Nazia P Saeed; Mark A Horsfield; Ronney B Panerai; Amit K Mistri; Tom G Robinson
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 6.200

5.  Dynamic Autoregulation Testing Does Not Indicate Changes of Cerebral Blood Flow Before and After Resection of Small- and Medium-Sized Cerebral AVM.

Authors:  Carsten Stüer; Toshiki Ikeda; Michael Stoffel; Carlo Schaller; Bernhard Meyer
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 6.829

6.  Longitudinal alterations in the dynamic autoregulation of optic nerve head blood flow revealed in experimental glaucoma.

Authors:  Lin Wang; Grant Cull; Claude F Burgoyne; Simon Thompson; Brad Fortune
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Cardiovascular responses to water immersion in humans: impact on cerebral perfusion.

Authors:  Howard H Carter; Angela L Spence; Christopher J A Pugh; Philip Ainslie; Louise H Naylor; Daniel J Green
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 8.  Integrative physiological and computational approaches to understand autonomic control of cerebral autoregulation.

Authors:  Can Ozan Tan; J Andrew Taylor
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 2.969

9.  Cerebral Autoregulation Real-Time Monitoring.

Authors:  Adi Tsalach; Eliahu Ratner; Stas Lokshin; Zmira Silman; Ilan Breskin; Nahum Budin; Moshe Kamar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Multimodal brain monitoring in fulminant hepatic failure.

Authors:  Fernando Mendes Paschoal; Ricardo Carvalho Nogueira; Karla De Almeida Lins Ronconi; Marcelo de Lima Oliveira; Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira; Edson Bor-Seng-Shu
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2016-08-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.