Literature DB >> 18362730

Primary reconstruction of open depressed skull fractures with titanium mesh.

Serge Marbacher1, Robert H Andres, Ali-Reza Fathi, Javier Fandino.   

Abstract

Open skull fractures have been traditionally managed in 2 stages: urgent craniotomy and elevation of the fracture with removal of contaminated bone, debridement, and delayed cranioplasty. Primary, single-stage repair of these injures has been said to entail risks such as infections. Recent experience, however, disproved these concerns. We used a primary single-stage reconstruction for patients presenting with open depressed skull fractures. All patients received antibiotic prophylaxis. The patients underwent elevation of the compound fracture and craniotomy if necessary. Debridement was performed, followed by skull reconstruction using a 0.6-mm titanium mesh. We present 5 consecutive male patients (age, 32.2 +/- 15.6 years) who underwent primary reconstruction of open depressed skull fractures. Clinical and radiologic follow-up was performed 2 months after surgery. The duration of the surgery was 2 +/- 1.6 hours. The size of the implanted mesh was 13 +/- 13.1 cm. No infection was detected in our series, with a follow-up period of 22 +/- 6.5 months (range, 16-29 months). The cosmetic result was defined in 4 patients as "excellent" and in 1 patient as "good."Primary reconstruction of open skull fractures with titanium mesh is feasible, safe, and cosmetically preferable than the conventional staged approach. The introduction into clinical practice can be warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18362730     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181534ae8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  9 in total

Review 1.  What's new in the surgical management of traumatic brain injury?

Authors:  Krunal Patel; Angelos G Kolias; Peter J Hutchinson
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Titanium Clamps for a Simple Low-Profile Autologous Osteosynthesis in the Reconstruction of Posttraumatic Craniofacial Convexital Skeletal Disruption.

Authors:  Amos Olufemi Adeleye; Toluyemi Adefolarin Malomo
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2016-10-17

Review 3.  Calvarial Reconstruction.

Authors:  Arvind Badhey; Sameep Kadakia; Moustafa Mourad; Jared Inman; Yadranko Ducic
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.314

4.  Intraoperative template-molded bone flap reconstruction for patient-specific cranioplasty.

Authors:  Serge Marbacher; Lukas Andereggen; Salome Erhardt; Ali-Reza Fathi; Javier Fandino; Andreas Raabe; Jürgen Beck
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Long-term Effect of Cranioplasty on Overlying Scalp Atrophy.

Authors:  Grzegorz J Kwiecien; Nicholas Sinclair; Demetrius M Coombs; Risal S Djohan; David Mihal; James E Zins
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-08-25

6.  Esthetic correction of depressed frontal bone fracture.

Authors:  J K Dayashankara Rao; Vijaylaxmi Malhotra; Ravi S Batra; Abhishek Kukreja
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-01

7.  Cranioplasty Using Autologous Bone versus Porous Polyethylene versus Custom-Made Titanium Mesh : A Retrospective Review of 108 Patients.

Authors:  Jun-Ki Kim; Sang-Bok Lee; Seo-Yeon Yang
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2018-10-30

8.  Subgaleal Effusion and Brain Midline Shift After Cranioplasty: A Retrospective Study Between Polyetheretherketone Cranioplasty and Titanium Cranioplasty After Decompressive Craniectomy.

Authors:  Tao Ji; Peiwen Yao; Yu Zeng; Zhouqi Qian; Ke Wang; Liang Gao
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-07-21

9.  Frontal Bone Fractures and Frontal Sinus Injuries: Treatment Paradigms.

Authors:  Priya Jeyaraj
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019 Jul-Dec
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.