Literature DB >> 25932148

Applications of computed tomography pelvimetry and clinical-pathological parameters in sphincter preservation of mid-low rectal cancer.

Xiaocong Zhou1, Meng Su2, Keqiong Hu3, Yinfa Su3, Yinghai Ye1, Chongquan Huang4, Zhenlei Yu4, Xiaoyang Li1, Hong Zhou1, Yaozhong Ni1, Yi Jiang5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the predictive value of pelvic anatomical and clinical-pathological parameters that influence the success of sphincter preservation procedure (SPP).
METHODS: We studied 42 consecutive patients who underwent low anterior resection (LAR) with double stapling technique (DST) anastomosis or abdominoperineal resection (APR) for mid-low rectal cancer between June 2009 and April 2014. The surgical procedures were performed by the same surgeon and surgical team at the Department of Surgery of Wenzhou Central Hospital. Pelvic dimensions and angles were measured using three-dimensional reconstruction of spiral computed tomography (CT) images. A number of clinical-pathological parameters were also examined. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the predictive significance of these variables that might affect a successful SPP for mid-low rectal cancer.
RESULTS: Body mass index (BMI), distance of tumor from anal verge, and diameter of upper pubis to coccyx affected the success of SPP. It was the higher distance of tumor from anal verge, the higher BMI, and the larger diameter of upper pubis to coccyx contributed most to the success of SPP.
CONCLUSIONS: Diameter of upper pubis to coccyx is the only one of the pelvic anatomical parameters that could affect the success of SPP for mid-low rectal cancer patients. Furthermore, within the normal BMI range, higher BMI seemed to be a favorable factor for the success of SPP.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; mid and low rectal cancer; pelvimetry; sphincter preservation; three-dimensional reconstruction

Year:  2015        PMID: 25932148      PMCID: PMC4402795     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med        ISSN: 1940-5901


  17 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance (MR) pelvimetry as a predictor of difficulty in laparoscopic operations for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Tim Killeen; Saswata Banerjee; Vardhini Vijay; Zaid Al-Dabbagh; Daren Francis; Steve Warren
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The cephalopelvic disproportion index. Combined fetal sonography and x-ray pelvimetry for early detection of cephalopelvic disproportion.

Authors:  M M Abitbol; U B Taylor; I Castillo; B L Rochelson
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 0.142

3.  Impact of total mesorectal excision on the results of surgery of distal rectal cancer.

Authors:  W L Law; K W Chu
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 4.  The anatomical substrate for a difference in surgical approach to rectal cancer in male and female patients.

Authors:  R C Verschueren; N H Mulder; A J Van Loon; A J De Ruiter; B G Szabo
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.480

5.  MRI assessment of the bony pelvis may help predict resectability of rectal cancer.

Authors:  K M Boyle; D Petty; A G Chalmers; P Quirke; A Cairns; P J Finan; P M Sagar; D Burke
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.788

6.  Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with double stapling technique anastomosis for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Takashi Akiyoshi; Hiroya Kuroyanagi; Masatoshi Oya; Tsuyoshi Konishi; Meiki Fukuda; Yoshiya Fujimoto; Masashi Ueno; Satoshi Miyata; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Is obesity a favorable factor for resectability of rectal cancer?

Authors:  Dénes Görög; András Tóth; Antal Péter; Ferenc Perner
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2004 May-Jun

Review 8.  Results of radical surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  R J Heald; N D Karanjia
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery--the clue to pelvic recurrence?

Authors:  R J Heald; E M Husband; R D Ryall
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Factors influencing pathologic results after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: analysis of consecutive 100 cases.

Authors:  Seung Hyuk Baik; Nam Kyu Kim; Kang Young Lee; Seung Kook Sohn; Chang Hwan Cho; Myeong Jin Kim; Hogeun Kim; Rina K Shinn
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  3 in total

1.  3D pelvimetry and biometric measurements: a surgical perspective for colorectal resections.

Authors:  Laura Lorenzon; Fabiano Bini; Federica Landolfi; Serena Quinzi; Genoveffa Balducci; Franco Marinozzi; Alberto Biondi; Roberto Persiani; Domenico D'Ugo; Flavio Tirelli; Elsa Iannicelli
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Transanal versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision in Male Patients with Low Tumor Location after Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ze Li; Jingkun Xiao; Yujie Hou; Xingwei Zhang; Haiqing Jie; Huashan Liu; Lei Ruan; Ziwei Zeng; Liang Kang
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 2.260

3.  Anatomical basis for the choice of laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer through the pelvic imaging data-a cohort study.

Authors:  Zhou Yang; Guo Chunhua; Yuan Huayan; Yang Jianguo; Cheng Yong
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 2.754

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.