Literature DB >> 18361639

Moral disengagement in ethical decision making: a study of antecedents and outcomes.

James R Detert1, Linda Klebe Treviño, Vicki L Sweitzer.   

Abstract

This article advances understanding of the antecedents and outcomes of moral disengagement by testing hypotheses with 3 waves of survey data from 307 business and education undergraduate students. The authors theorize that 6 individual differences will either increase or decrease moral disengagement, defined as a set of cognitive mechanisms that deactivate moral self-regulatory processes and thereby help to explain why individuals often make unethical decisions without apparent guilt or self-censure (Bandura, 1986). Results support 4 individual difference hypotheses, specifically, that empathy and moral identity are negatively related to moral disengagement, while trait cynicism and chance locus of control orientation are positively related to moral disengagement. Two additional locus of control orientations are not significantly related to moral disengagement. The authors also hypothesize and find that moral disengagement is positively related to unethical decision making. Finally, the authors hypothesize that moral disengagement plays a mediating role between the individual differences they studied and unethical decisions. Their results offer partial support for these mediating hypotheses. The authors discuss the implications of these findings for future research and for practice. Copyright 2008 APA

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18361639     DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9010


  38 in total

1.  Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior.

Authors:  Paul K Piff; Daniel M Stancato; Stéphane Côté; Rodolfo Mendoza-Denton; Dacher Keltner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Winning a competition predicts dishonest behavior.

Authors:  Amos Schurr; Ilana Ritov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Moral Disengagement, Anticipated Social Outcomes and Adolescents' Alcohol Use: Parallel Latent Growth Curve Analyses.

Authors:  Catherine A Quinn; Kay Bussey
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2015-08-29

4.  The capacity for ethical decisions: the relationship between working memory and ethical decision making.

Authors:  April Martin; Zhanna Bagdasarov; Shane Connelly
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Differences in Biases and Compensatory Strategies Across Discipline, Rank, and Gender Among University Academics.

Authors:  Vincent Giorgini; Carter Gibson; Jensen T Mecca; Kelsey E Medeiros; Michael D Mumford; Shane Connelly; Lynn D Devenport
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Predicting Pro-environmental Intention and Behavior Based on Justice Sensitivity, Moral Disengagement, and Moral Emotions - Results of Two Quota-Sampling Surveys.

Authors:  Susanne Nicolai; Philipp Franikowski; Susanne Stoll-Kleemann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-24

7.  Self-Serving Dishonesty Partially Substitutes Fairness in Motivating Cooperation When People Are Treated Fairly.

Authors:  Dandan Li; Ofir Turel; Shuyue Zhang; Qinghua He
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 4.614

8.  An Unethical Organizational Behavior for the Sake of the Family: Perceived Risk of Job Insecurity, Family Motivation and Financial Pressures.

Authors:  Ibrahim A Elshaer; Marwa Ghanem; Alaa M S Azazz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 4.614

9.  Moral Disengagement as Mediator and Moderator of the Relation Between Empathy and Aggression Among Chinese Male Juvenile Delinquents.

Authors:  Xingchao Wang; Li Lei; Jiping Yang; Ling Gao; Fengqing Zhao
Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev       Date:  2017-04

10.  Professional Decision-Making in Research (PDR): The Validity of a New Measure.

Authors:  James M DuBois; John T Chibnall; Raymond C Tait; Jillon S Vander Wal; Kari A Baldwin; Alison L Antes; Michael D Mumford
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 3.525

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.