Literature DB >> 18359910

Fetal ultrasound: mechanical effects.

Melvin E Stratmeyer1, James F Greenleaf, Diane Dalecki, Kjell A Salvesen.   

Abstract

In this discussion, any biological effect of ultrasound that is accompanied by temperature increments less than 1 degrees C above normal physiologic levels is called a mechanical effect. However, one should keep in mind that the term mechanical effect also includes processes that are not of a mechanical nature but arise secondary to mechanical interaction between ultrasound and tissues, such as chemical reactions initiated by free oxygen species generated during cavitation and sonoluminescence. Investigations with laboratory animals have documented that pulsed ultrasound can produce damage to biological tissues in vivo through nonthermal mechanisms. The acoustic output used to induce these adverse bio-effects is considerably greater than the output of diagnostic devices when gas bodies are not present. However, low-intensity pulsed ultrasound is used clinically to accelerate the bone fracture repair process and induce healing of nonunions in humans. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound also has been shown to enhance repair of soft tissue damage and accelerate nerve regeneration in animal models. Although such exposures to low intensity do not appear to cause damage to exposed tissues, they do raise questions about the acoustic threshold that might induce potentially adverse developmental effects in the fetus. To date, bioeffects studies in humans do not substantiate a causal relationship between diagnostic ultrasound exposure during pregnancy and adverse biological effects to the fetus. However, the epidemiologic studies were conducted with commercially available devices predating 1992, having outputs not exceeding a derated spatial-peak temporal-average intensity (ISPTA.3) of 94 mW/cm2. Current limits in the United States allow an ISPTA.3 of 720 mW/cm2 for obstetric modes. At the time of this report, available evidence, experimental or epidemiologic, is insufficient to conclude that there is a causal relationship between obstetric diagnostic ultrasound exposure and adverse nonthermal effects to the fetus. However, low-intensity pulsed ultrasound effects reported in humans and animal models indicate a need for further investigation of potentially adverse developmental effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18359910     DOI: 10.7863/jum.2008.27.4.597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  7 in total

1.  Prenatal ultrasound heating impacts on fluctuations in haematological analysis of Oryctolagus cuniculus.

Authors:  Farah Wahida Ahmad Zaiki; Sulaiman Md Dom; Hairil Rashmizal Abdul Razak; Hamzah Fansuri Hassan
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2013-10

2.  The effects of altered ultrasound parameters on the recovery of sciatic nerve injury.

Authors:  Zhamak Akhlaghi; Jalal Izadi Mobarakeh; Mehrdad Mokhtari; Hamid Behnam; Amir Abbas Rahimi; Mohammad Saleh Khajeh Hosseini; Farzaneh Samiee
Journal:  Iran Biomed J       Date:  2012

3.  Inhibitory effects of low-energy pulsed ultrasonic stimulation on cell surface protein antigen C through heat shock proteins GroEL and DnaK in Streptococcus mutans.

Authors:  Kazuya Ishibashi; Koichi Shimada; Takayuki Kawato; Shigejyu Kaji; Masao Maeno; Shuichi Sato; Koichi Ito
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  Conditionally Increased Acoustic Pressures in Nonfetal Diagnostic Ultrasound Examinations Without Contrast Agents: A Preliminary Assessment.

Authors:  Kathryn R Nightingale; Charles C Church; Gerald Harris; Keith A Wear; Michael R Bailey; Paul L Carson; Hui Jiang; Kurt L Sandstrom; Thomas L Szabo; Marvin C Ziskin
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  A theoretical study of inertial cavitation from acoustic radiation force impulse imaging and implications for the mechanical index.

Authors:  Charles C Church; Cecille Labuda; Kathryn Nightingale
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  A system for investigation of biological effects of diagnostic ultrasound on development of zebrafish embryos.

Authors:  Douglas L Miller; Weibin Zhou
Journal:  Zebrafish       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 1.985

7.  Knowledge and attitudes of ultrasonography physicians regarding the biological effects of ultrasound in French-speaking sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Kokou Adambounou; Komlan Amoussou; Alexis Agbodjan; Amégninou Mawuko Yao Adigo; Lantam Sonhaye; Victor Adjenou
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2021-06-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.