Literature DB >> 18358818

Single-molecule polymerase chain reaction reduces bias: application to DNA methylation analysis by bisulfite sequencing.

Aparna Chhibber1, Benjamin G Schroeder.   

Abstract

The treatment of DNA with bisulfite, which converts C to U but leaves 5-methyl-C unchanged, forms the basis of many analytical techniques for DNA methylation analysis. Many techniques exist for measuring the methylation state of a single CpG but, for analysis of an entire region, cloning and sequencing remains the gold standard. However, biases in polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and in cloning can skew the results. We hypothesized that single-molecule PCR (smPCR) amplification would eliminate the PCR amplification bias because competition between templates that amplify at different efficiencies no longer exists. The amplified products can be sequenced directly, thus eliminating cloning bias. We demonstrated this accurate and unbiased approach by analyzing a sample that was expected to contain a 50:50 ratio of methylated to unmethylated molecules: a region of the X-linked FMR1 gene from a human female cell line. We compared traditional cloning and sequencing to smPCR and sequencing. Sequencing smPCR products gave an expected methylated to unmethylated ratio of 48:52, whereas conventional cloning and sequencing gave a biased ratio of 72:28. Our results show that smPCR sequencing can eliminate both PCR and cloning bias and represents an attractive approach to bisulfite sequencing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18358818     DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2008.02.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Biochem        ISSN: 0003-2697            Impact factor:   3.365


  17 in total

1.  DNA methylation screening and analysis.

Authors:  Karilyn E Sant; Muna S Nahar; Dana C Dolinoy
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012

2.  Next-generation sequencing reveals regional differences of the α-synuclein methylation state independent of Lewy body disease.

Authors:  L de Boni; S Tierling; S Roeber; J Walter; A Giese; Hans A Kretzschmar
Journal:  Neuromolecular Med       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 3.843

Review 3.  Principles and challenges of genomewide DNA methylation analysis.

Authors:  Peter W Laird
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  A cell-free microtiter plate screen for improved [FeFe] hydrogenases.

Authors:  James A Stapleton; James R Swartz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Correction of PCR-bias in quantitative DNA methylation studies by means of cubic polynomial regression.

Authors:  Evgeny A Moskalev; Mikhail G Zavgorodnij; Svetlana P Majorova; Ivan A Vorobjev; Pouria Jandaghi; Irina V Bure; Jörg D Hoheisel
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Single molecule PCR reveals similar patterns of non-homologous DSB repair in tobacco and Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Andrew H Lloyd; Dong Wang; Jeremy N Timmis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Intra-tumor heterogeneity of MLH1 promoter methylation revealed by deep single molecule bisulfite sequencing.

Authors:  Katherine E Varley; David G Mutch; Tina B Edmonston; Paul J Goodfellow; Robi D Mitra
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Epigenetic upregulation of HGF and c-Met drives metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Olorunseun O Ogunwobi; William Puszyk; Hui-Jia Dong; Chen Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Quick, Selective and Reversible Photocrosslinking Reaction between 5-Methylcytosine and 3-Cyanovinylcarbazole in DNA Double Strand.

Authors:  Kenzo Fujimo; Kaoru Konishi-Hiratsuka; Takashi Sakamoto
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Epigenetic changes in Basal Cell Carcinoma affect SHH and WNT signaling components.

Authors:  Tjinta Brinkhuizen; Karin van den Hurk; Véronique J L Winnepenninckx; Joep P de Hoon; Ariënne M van Marion; Jürgen Veeck; Manon van Engeland; Maurice A M van Steensel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.