UNLABELLED: The functioning of low back muscles of back pain patients during flexion and reextension has not been properly investigated. In this study, we analyzed rectified, averaged electric activity (RMS EMG) and corresponding raw intramuscular (IM) EMG from lumbar paraspinal muscles to quantify the activity level during simple bending cycles in 87 back pain patients compared to 25 able-bodied controls. THE RESULTS: All functional phases seen in raw IM EMG were also shown in surface RMS EMG. Surface RMS EMG pattern seems to yield more information from activity level than IM EMG pattern. The RMS EMG patterns of back pain patients differed from those of controls as follows: (1) There was clearly noticeable activity during standing in back pain patients. (2) There was only a partial decrease of EMG activity after flexion in back pain patients with current pain. (3) The ratio of mean reached at maximal activity level during extension and flexion was less in patients (1.8, SD = 0.5, p less than .001) than able-bodied controls (3.2, SD = 0.8). (4) Segmental differences were observed in IM EMG activities in patients having hypermobility in bending x-ray. (5) Large peak potentials occurred during movements in patients having segmental hypermobility. THE RESULTS indicate that averaged surface recording is a valuable tool in the investigation of dynamic spine functions in back pain patients.
UNLABELLED: The functioning of low back muscles of back painpatients during flexion and reextension has not been properly investigated. In this study, we analyzed rectified, averaged electric activity (RMS EMG) and corresponding raw intramuscular (IM) EMG from lumbar paraspinal muscles to quantify the activity level during simple bending cycles in 87 back painpatients compared to 25 able-bodied controls. THE RESULTS: All functional phases seen in raw IM EMG were also shown in surface RMS EMG. Surface RMS EMG pattern seems to yield more information from activity level than IM EMG pattern. The RMS EMG patterns of back painpatients differed from those of controls as follows: (1) There was clearly noticeable activity during standing in back painpatients. (2) There was only a partial decrease of EMG activity after flexion in back painpatients with current pain. (3) The ratio of mean reached at maximal activity level during extension and flexion was less in patients (1.8, SD = 0.5, p less than .001) than able-bodied controls (3.2, SD = 0.8). (4) Segmental differences were observed in IM EMG activities in patients having hypermobility in bending x-ray. (5) Large peak potentials occurred during movements in patients having segmental hypermobility. THE RESULTS indicate that averaged surface recording is a valuable tool in the investigation of dynamic spine functions in back painpatients.