INTRODUCTION: Catheter stability is a key prerequisite for a successful EP procedure. Remote magnetic navigation system (RMNS) was recently introduced for the manipulation of EP catheters. It may provide an improved catheter stability but this has not been tested prospectively. We performed a prospective cross-over study which compares the amplitude and stability of the His-electrogram obtained by catheters using RMNS vs conventional manual catheter placement. METHODS: His-electrograms were continuously recorded for 3 min with a conventional His mapping catheter and magnetically tipped catheter capable of alignment in the direction of an externally controlled magnetic field (0.08-0.1 Tesla) in the same patient. First 100 beats of each recording were used for data analysis. The amplitudes of each set of His-electrograms were measured and compared in microvolts. Coefficient of variation of the measured His-signal amplitude was calculated for each beat. Miller's test for the equality of the coefficients of variation and Levene's test of homogeneity of variance were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (6 males; aged 48+/-25 years) were included in the study. His-electrograms were more stable and homogenous with RMNS than manual method in 10/14 patients. Pooled variance of all RMNS recordings was significantly less than pooled variance of manual recordings (p=0.01). CONCLUSION: His-electrogram recording using RMNS is more stable and homogeneous than traditional manual method in most patients. These data indicate a superior catheter stability with RMNS.
INTRODUCTION: Catheter stability is a key prerequisite for a successful EP procedure. Remote magnetic navigation system (RMNS) was recently introduced for the manipulation of EP catheters. It may provide an improved catheter stability but this has not been tested prospectively. We performed a prospective cross-over study which compares the amplitude and stability of the His-electrogram obtained by catheters using RMNS vs conventional manual catheter placement. METHODS:His-electrograms were continuously recorded for 3 min with a conventional His mapping catheter and magnetically tipped catheter capable of alignment in the direction of an externally controlled magnetic field (0.08-0.1 Tesla) in the same patient. First 100 beats of each recording were used for data analysis. The amplitudes of each set of His-electrograms were measured and compared in microvolts. Coefficient of variation of the measured His-signal amplitude was calculated for each beat. Miller's test for the equality of the coefficients of variation and Levene's test of homogeneity of variance were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (6 males; aged 48+/-25 years) were included in the study. His-electrograms were more stable and homogenous with RMNS than manual method in 10/14 patients. Pooled variance of all RMNS recordings was significantly less than pooled variance of manual recordings (p=0.01). CONCLUSION:His-electrogram recording using RMNS is more stable and homogeneous than traditional manual method in most patients. These data indicate a superior catheter stability with RMNS.
Authors: Mitchell N Faddis; Walter Blume; Jennifer Finney; Andrew Hall; John Rauch; Jon Sell; Kyongtae Ty Bae; Michael Talcott; Bruce Lindsay Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-12-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Roger Kerzner; José Mauricio Sánchez; Judy L Osborn; Jane Chen; Mitchell N Faddis; Marye J Gleva; Bruce D Lindsay; Timothy W Smith Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Mitchell N Faddis; Jane Chen; Judy Osborn; Michael Talcott; Michael E Cain; Bruce D Lindsay Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2003-12-03 Impact factor: 24.094