Literature DB >> 18357403

Does a novel school-based physical activity model benefit femoral neck bone strength in pre- and early pubertal children?

H M Macdonald1, S A Kontulainen, M A Petit, T J Beck, K M Khan, H A McKay.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The effects of physical activity on bone strength acquisition during growth are not well understood. In our cluster randomized trial, we found that participation in a novel school-based physical activity program enhanced bone strength acquisition and bone mass accrual by 2-5% at the femoral neck in girls; however, these benefits depended on teacher compliance with intervention delivery. Our intervention also enhanced bone mass accrual by 2-4% at the lumbar spine and total body in boys.
INTRODUCTION: We investigated the effects of a novel school-based physical activity program on femoral neck (FN) bone strength and mass in children aged 9-11 yrs.
METHODS: We used hip structure analysis to compare 16-month changes in FN bone strength, geometry and bone mineral content (BMC) between 293 children who participated in Action Schools! BC (AS! BC) and 117 controls. We assessed proximal femur (PF), lumbar spine (LS) and total body (TB) BMC using DXA. We compared change in bone outcomes between groups using linear regression accounting for the random school effect and select covariates.
RESULTS: Change in FN strength (section modulus, Z), cross-sectional area (CSA), subperiosteal width and BMC was similar between control and intervention boys, but intervention boys had greater gains in BMC at the LS (+2.7%, p = 0.05) and TB (+1.7%, p = 0.03) than controls. For girls, change in FN-Z tended to be greater (+3.5%, p = 0.1) for intervention girls than controls. The difference in change increased to 5.4% (p = 0.05) in a per-protocol analysis that included girls whose teachers reported 80% compliance.
CONCLUSION: AS! BC benefits bone strength and mass in school-aged children; however, our findings highlight the importance of accounting for teacher compliance in classroom-based physical activity interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18357403     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-008-0589-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  38 in total

1.  Advanced statistics: statistical methods for analyzing cluster and cluster-randomized data.

Authors:  Robert L Wears
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.451

2.  Vertical ground reaction forces of children during one- and two-leg rope jumping.

Authors:  Vicki M Pittenger; Steven T McCaw; David Q Thomas
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  The review process fails to require appropriate statistical analysis of a group-randomized trial.

Authors:  Peter J Hannan; Simone A French; John H Himes; Jayne A Fulkerson; Mary Story
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Measuring general levels of physical activity: preliminary evidence for the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children.

Authors:  P R Crocker; D A Bailey; R A Faulkner; K C Kowalski; R McGrath
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Femoral neck cortical geometry measured with magnetic resonance imaging is associated with proximal femur strength.

Authors:  S L Manske; T Liu-Ambrose; P M de Bakker; D Liu; S Kontulainen; P Guy; T R Oxland; H A McKay
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Lessons learned from Action Schools! BC--an 'active school' model to promote physical activity in elementary schools.

Authors:  Patti-Jean Naylor; Heather M Macdonald; Janelle A Zebedee; Katherine E Reed; Heather A McKay
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 4.319

7.  Five jumps per day increase bone mass and breaking force in rats.

Authors:  Y Umemura; T Ishiko; T Yamauchi; M Kurono; S Mashiko
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Lifestyle risk factors for osteoporosis in Asian and Caucasian girls.

Authors:  K J Mackelvie; H A McKay; K M Khan; P R Crocker
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Bone mass and structure are enhanced following a 2-year randomized controlled trial of exercise in prepubertal boys.

Authors:  Kerry J MacKelvie; Moira A Petit; Karim M Khan; Thomas J Beck; Heather A McKay
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Associations of social and demographic variables with calcium intakes of high school students.

Authors:  S I Barr
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  1994-03
View more
  16 in total

1.  Short-term physical activity intervention decreases femoral bone marrow adipose tissue in young children: a pilot study.

Authors:  K Casazza; L J Hanks; B Hidalgo; H H Hu; O Affuso
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Tanning predicts bone mass but not structure in adolescent females living in Hawaii.

Authors:  Daniel L Osborne; Connie M Weaver; Linda D McAbe; George M McCabe; Rachel Novotny; Carol Boushey; Dennis A Savaiano
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 1.937

3.  Effects of body mass-based squat training in adolescent boys.

Authors:  Yohei Takai; Yuko Fukunaga; Eiji Fujita; Hisashi Mori; Takaya Yoshimoto; Masayoshi Yamamoto; Hiroaki Kanehisa
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 4.  Plyometric exercise and bone health in children and adolescents: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alejandro Gómez-Bruton; Ángel Matute-Llorente; Alejandro González-Agüero; José A Casajús; Germán Vicente-Rodríguez
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2017-01-15       Impact factor: 2.764

5.  A school-based resistance intervention improves skeletal growth in adolescent females.

Authors:  B Bernardoni; J Thein-Nissenbaum; J Fast; M Day; Q Li; S Wang; T Scerpella
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  The National Osteoporosis Foundation's position statement on peak bone mass development and lifestyle factors: a systematic review and implementation recommendations.

Authors:  C M Weaver; C M Gordon; K F Janz; H J Kalkwarf; J M Lappe; R Lewis; M O'Karma; T C Wallace; B S Zemel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Targeted exercise against osteoporosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis for optimising bone strength throughout life.

Authors:  Riku Nikander; Harri Sievänen; Ari Heinonen; Robin M Daly; Kirsti Uusi-Rasi; Pekka Kannus
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 8.775

8.  Exercise and Bone Macro-architecture: Is Childhood a Window of Opportunity for Osteoporosis Prevention?

Authors:  Scott B Going; Joshua N Farr
Journal:  Int J Body Compos Res       Date:  2010-12

9.  Effects of weight-bearing exercise on bone health in girls: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Saori Ishikawa; Youngdeok Kim; Minsoo Kang; Don W Morgan
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Bone mass and geometry of the tibia and the radius of master sprinters, middle and long distance runners, race-walkers and sedentary control participants: a pQCT study.

Authors:  D C Wilks; K Winwood; S F Gilliver; A Kwiet; M Chatfield; I Michaelis; L W Sun; J L Ferretti; A J Sargeant; D Felsenberg; J Rittweger
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.