Literature DB >> 15050908

Bone mass and structure are enhanced following a 2-year randomized controlled trial of exercise in prepubertal boys.

Kerry J MacKelvie1, Moira A Petit, Karim M Khan, Thomas J Beck, Heather A McKay.   

Abstract

Exercise during growth has a positive influence on bone mineral accrual, yet little is known about how bone geometry and strength adapt to loading during growth. Our primary objective was to compare changes in proximal femur bone geometry and strength between 31 prepubertal (Tanner Stage 1) boys who participated in a school-based, high-impact circuit intervention (12 min, three times a week) for 20 months and 33 maturity-matched controls. Our secondary objective was to compare changes in total body (TB), proximal femur (PF), and lumbar spine (LS) bone mineral content (BMC) and bone area (BA) in these groups. We assessed geometric variables and bone strength at the narrow neck (NN), intertrochanteric (TR) region, and femoral shaft regions by applying the Hip Structure Analysis program to proximal femur dual energy X-ray absorptiometry scans (DXA, Hologic QDR 4500). Further, we assessed total body, lumbar spine, and proximal femur BMC and BA by DXA and derived total body lean mass and fat mass from total body scans. Intervention (10.2 +/- 0.5 years) and control boys (10.1 +/- 0.5 years) had similar baseline height (140.8 vs. 141.3 cm) and weight (36.9 vs. 35.4 kg), and average 20-month physical activity scores (Physical Activity Questionnaire for Children, PAQ-C) and calcium intakes (861 vs. 852 mg/day, food frequency questionnaire). Twenty-month height and weight changes were not significantly different between groups; lean mass changed more (P < 0.05) in intervention boys (22.8%) than control boys (18.6%). At the NN region, intervention boys had greater bone expansion on both the periosteal (+2.6%, P = 0.1) and endosteal (+2.7%, P = 0.2) surfaces, resulting in significantly greater changes in section modulus (bone bending strength) (+7.5%, P = 0.02, ANCOVA, adjusting for height change, final Tanner Stage, and baseline bone values). Changes at the intertrochanteric and femoral shaft regions were not significantly different between groups. Femoral neck (FN) BMC changes were significantly greater in intervention boys (+4.3%, P < 0.01); changes in BA and BMC for other regions were not significantly different between groups. In summary, a school-based, high-impact exercise intervention implemented three times a week for 12 min is an effective strategy for site-specific gains in bone strength at the narrow neck region of the proximal femur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15050908     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2003.12.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  60 in total

1.  Epidemiology of bone fracture across the age span in blacks and whites.

Authors:  Joyce C Pressley; Tiffany D Kendig; Stanley K Frencher; Barbara Barlow; Lodze Quitel; Fauzia Waqar
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2011-11

Review 2.  Bone outcomes and technical measurement issues of bone health among children and adolescents: considerations for nutrition and physical activity intervention trials.

Authors:  Jayne A Fulkerson; John H Himes; Simone A French; Sally Jensen; Moira A Petit; Christy Stewart; Mary Story; Kristine Ensrud; Sandy Fillhouer; Kristine Jacobsen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-08-27       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a consensus document of the Belgian Bone Club.

Authors:  Steven Boonen; Jean-Jacques Body; Yves Boutsen; Jean-Pierre Devogelaer; Stefan Goemaere; Jean-Marc Kaufman; Serge Rozenberg; Jean-Yves Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Bone mass acquisition in healthy children.

Authors:  J H Davies; B A J Evans; J W Gregory
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Genetic determination and correlation of body weight and body mass index (BMI) and cross-sectional geometric parameters of the femoral neck.

Authors:  Hong Xu; Ji-Rong Long; Yan-Jun Yang; Fei-Yan Deng; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-09-02       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Adaptive skeletal responses to mechanical loading during adolescence.

Authors:  David A Greene; Geraldine A Naughton
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 7.  How does exercise affect bone development during growth?

Authors:  German Vicente-Rodríguez
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Effects of a daily school based physical activity intervention program on muscle development in prepubertal girls.

Authors:  Susanna Stenevi-Lundgren; Robin M Daly; Christian Lindén; Per Gärdsell; Magnus K Karlsson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 9.  Bone quality: the determinants of bone strength and fragility.

Authors:  Hélder Fonseca; Daniel Moreira-Gonçalves; Hans-Joachim Appell Coriolano; José Alberto Duarte
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 10.  School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18.

Authors:  Maureen Dobbins; Heather Husson; Kara DeCorby; Rebecca L LaRocca
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.